Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • Polderviking@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I remember elon saying something along the lines of his camera system being just as good and they thusly don’t need to employ things like LIDAR.

  • RambaZamba@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Things that happen when you rely exclusively on optical sensors, i.e. cameras. But that’s just cheaper, more money for Nazi Elon.

      • Tzig@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The hardware is, which is the important part at scale: even if the code is 10x more expensive when you sell millions of the car it becomes pennies/car

  • Yoga@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Insurance fraud is going to bankrupt Tesla robotaxis faster than an incompetent CEO ever could.

    There will be too many ways to defeat the cameras and not having LiDAR unlike the rest of the industry may prove to be found to be a failure of duty of care.

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s dirt cheap, too. If this was a cost-cutting measure, it was a thoroughly idiotic one. Which feels like the mark… of a certain someone I can think of

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Make Elon test ride the first Tesla robotaxi and there’s a chance the funniest thing of all time will happen.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I am very glad that Elon and Trump have overreached and now Tesla is suffering. I hope Starlink is the next domino to fall.

  • Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I had a conversation with a friend who claimed the road and sign system we have in our country, has errors in it causing her brand new car to act weird.

    By acting weird she meant, phantom breaking. Breaking when the car thinks the car driving the opposite direction is coming head on. Sudden and small jerks inside the lane. Not following the speed limit.

    She thought and probably still thinks the road system and not the car, is at fault. It’s a Skoda fyi. These assistants ruin driving. I’m hesitant to catch a ride with her again.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    New stuff to add to the car kit bag for the 21st century

    1. poster board to block usonic weapons
    2. black paint, white paint, roller, brush to paint tunnels on walls
    3. orange cones to pen in self driving cars
  • Magnus@lemmy.brandyapple.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I remember Elon foolishly saying his cars don’t need radar or lidar. Even software-disabling radar in cars that already had the hardware.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Not even just his cars, he thinks the MILITARY, doesn’t need radar and can just use cameras to spot and track stealth fighters.

      He’s a fucking lunatic.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        As an augmentation, the ability to spot and track objects visually would be amazing.
        But then planes just have to fly above 10k ft, and pretty much guaranteed cloud cover.

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Is this video being suppressed by the YouTube algorithm? I wonder if it’s because of Tesla or Disney. Or maybe it’s because of simulated child harm?

  • Billybob22@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Don’t want to rock the boat but apart from being a you tube money earner this doesn’t prove or disprove anything. A lot of humans would be fooled by this also.

    I am suspicious of the way the polystyrene wall broke in cartoon like shagged edges, almost like they were precut.

    • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It may not rise to the level of proof, but it is a memorable and easily understood demonstration of something already proven by car safety researchers, as mentioned in the article.

      Why shouldn’t they precut the wall into cartoony shapes? It adds entertainment and doesn’t compromise the demonstration.

      • Billybob22@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yep agreed. Having used Teslas adaptive cruise control I wouldn’t ever use self driving, not that I have it, unless I had a death wish. Quite honestly my previous Chinese MG was a lot less likely to kill me.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          They were expecting this result to be possible. What were they supposed to do? Slam the car into the side if a building?

      • Billybob22@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yes but the main point that has been shown is that putting a screen up with the exact copy of the road and surroundings behind the screen is a daft and dangerous idea. It would be a better test if they had put up a polystyrene tree in the middle of the road and then checked if the car stopped.

        I have never driven through a polystyrene wall with a picture of a road on it in 40 years because people just don’t put those things up, they don’t grow on roads etc etc.

        Great YT clip for entertainment though.

  • EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Apparently they keep getting tickets in China because they didn’t bother to adjust the settings to accommodate Chinese roads and traffic laws. Result is Tesla is getting utterly crushed by BYD in their one major market that doesn’t care about Elon’s antics.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Huh, now I’m mildly interested in the differences in traffic laws in China vs US vs Europe that lead to Teslas getting more tickets in China than elsewhere.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I found this article. My takeaways were:

        1. No driving in bus lanes during certain times of day.
        2. No using the shoulder as a turn lane.
        3. No using a bike lane as a turn lane.
            • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              I think their regs, while seemingly very basic rules of the road, are based because I live in the US and we have bike lanes here that just whole ass turn into turn lanes with almost no warning. I wish we could get basic decency for everyone on the road, too.