The tool, which is able to cut lines at depths of up to 4,000 metres (13,123 feet) – twice the maximum operational range of existing subsea communication infrastructure – has been designed specifically for integration with China’s advanced crewed and uncrewed submersibles like the Fendouzhe, or Striver, and the Haidou series.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean, no? Ok let’s say you did cut off the internet, there’s still radio. Shortwave still can reach spies in foreign countries with their numbers stations now, and then there’s VHF/UHF at home etc. Snail mail still exists, so does ol’ fashioned landlines for communication at least internally even if they cut undersea telcom cables, hell I’m pretty sure CDMA would still be running, this sets us back to like 1990 at most, especially if we take this threat seriously and start implementing non-internet based (or sat internet) fallbacks just in case standard comms go down for a while until a new cable can be lain.

    Like don’t get me wrong, we’d definitely feel the effects, but this isn’t some kind of world dominating shit we’re talking about here, it’s just pretty inconvenient, especially if we already have alts in place as fallbacks so we don’t have to scramble to set them up.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Cool

    So for every European deep sea cable cut it should send a fleet of Russian and Chinese ships to the bottom, torpedo the fuckers. Just by default presume it was either of them and make then responsible for the safety of our cables. If you fail to protect our cables, we’ll send your ships to the next life.

    Gloves. Off.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Coming soon to vague shell corporation owned fishing boats to the shore of the Baltic and Northern seas!

    Sponsored by China and Russia

  • Lit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    If only cables can be designed to pull down ships that try to cut or anchor drag them. Maybe defensive cable around the main cable. Or some kind bigger of casing/shell around actual cable.

  • Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Reset the world order by sending everybody including China back to stone age right? That’d be fun.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    No shit, lol. Those cunts have been cutting cables for almost a year now. This is why countries tend to hide the exact locations of cables. Shit is expensive.

    • Kabriste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      For me it’s quite the opposite. It’s all about power projection in the grand scheme of things.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Powerful seems like a pointless adjective here.

    It doesn’t take much power to destroy a cable. Did they invent a really long, and powerful, chain with a powerful anchor on it only usable by a boat with powerful electric winch?

    Maybe they put AI in it too, for extra power of course

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Operational depth is essentially the same as the claimed operational depth that oceangate sub that popped the other year. I have a lot more confidence that these things will actually work when China does it instead of some incompetent millionaire/billionaire.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Good thing we have the channel tunnel I guess, repurpose that for data cables that are protected.