Modlog: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog/25693?page=1&actionType=All&userId=21053985 , banned by @goat@sh.itjust.works

For context, goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, and got into a few arguments.

More context:

It started (to my knowledge) with this comment, goat pinged db0 after he downvoted a comment

a note on the uyghurs (click to show

For the record, I believe that the Uyghurs are mistreated by the CCP, and are experiencing cultural erasure and Human Rights abuses, but there’s a lack of evidence that it’s a genocide specifically (especially since it seems to target the religion, rather than the ethnic group).

Goat banned IndustryStandard, leading to this thread: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/ leading to goat commenting this:
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/21070262

He mentions this:

We constantly encounter bots, spammers, alt accounts, trolls, and doxxers, so I need to be vigilant by regularly checking who’s interfering and from where.

Which I find ironic, since there was some vote manipulation happening, which goat did nothing about (and could be behind), but I’ll get to that later.

After some more arguments, goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, saying that letting tankie users engage on dbzer0 comms means other users are tankies:


source

He said that it’s different for LW (lemmy.world) and SJW (sh.itjust.works, not the other word). He then poster the “Tank Man” picture to !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com, as he expected us to retaliate (being tankies, according to him). We did not, in fact, retaliate: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21089819

He also posted this in tankiejerk: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52268655, https://sh.itjust.works/comment/20733015.

He also may have done vote manipulation, and at the very least allowed it.
Take, for example, this comment: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21091723
Per lemvotes, it was downvoted by the following users:

The relevant ones here are:

They have all downvoted exclusively arguments against goat and others, and were made almost at the same time.

After a bit more arguing (I’m not posting the specific comments because it’s tedious, and they’re easy to see by scrolling through goat’s profile.) goat decided to ban all dbzer0 users from meanwhileongrad, I think this comment marks when he decided to do this, but I may be wrong.

note on the post that comment was in reply to

I think this reply (by unruffled) was taken out of context. Unruffled is absolutely not defending what’s happening to the Uyghurs, they’re saying that a lot of people have a double standard, where they will not hesitate to condemn the Uyghur genocide, but hesitate on the gaza one, especially when the gaza one is more severe and urgent. To quote them directly:

Yes, that’s exactly what I was saying but of course they misrepresented it. You know exactly what Americans are like. They couldn’t give a shit about the uyghurs, except as a way to China bash and feel superior. I also explicitly said later in the comments I agreed it was a genocide. They’re just doin’ the usual bad faith takes.

Feel free to quote me lol

Since this goat had been banned from dbzer0 for being hostile: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=63615

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I didn’t put any words in your mouth. I have no idea to what extent you believe or disbelieve the forced sterilization and birth limits narrative. But now that you mention it, on re-reading it does seem like you were leaning toward giving such claims the benefit of the doubt.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Do you think that because I believe the reporting about the genocide in China that I don’t also know Israel is and has been committing genocide on the Palestinian people for decades?

          Yall tankies are fucking wild.

            • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Correct, I never believed there were weapons of mass destruction and I also never doubted the genocide in Palestine. I also don’t doubt the genocide of the Uyghur people.

              What are you getting at? Do you need to repair your treads?

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Oh, so you only very selectively believe the “free press” then. Sure they lied about WMDs in Iraq, they lied about rape squads in Libya, they lied about beheaded babies in Palestine, but they’re are definitely telling the truth about China!

                Hey, given that all the major primary sources for the Uyghur genocide claim also support Israel and deny that there’s a genocide in Gaza, why don’t you trust them there too? If you believe them when they say there’s a genocide in China, why don’t you believe them when they say there isn’t one in Gaza?

                • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I was alive during 9/11 and the “wmds” in Iraq and not all of the world’s free press agreed.

                  Idk if you think I’m saying the corporate owned “news” outlets are free press but you’re assuming you know what I believe.

                  Why are you so vehemently defending China and giving them the benefit of the doubt here?

                  Al Jazeera, a marked “not western press outlet” has even called it out.

                  You might not be able to comprehend this but I am capable of free thought AND making my own educated decisions based on a multitude of input, and just because the “free press you currently hate says the thing you don’t like” doesn’t make them wrong (nor does it make them right).

                  Don’t toss your turret too high my guy.

                  • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I was alive during 9/11 and the “wmds” in Iraq and not all of the world’s free press agreed.

                    Lol, there were more “free press” outlets saying that there were WMDs in Iraq then then there are ones saying there’s a genocide in China now.

                    Idk if you think I’m saying the corporate owned “news” outlets are free press

                    No, you’re saying that, because that’s the only way you could come to the conclusion that “the free press” claim there’s a genocide in China

                    Why are you so vehemently defending China and giving them the benefit of the doubt here?

                    Damn, great standard of evidence there. Why are you so vehemently defending Sadam Hussain and giving him the benefit of the doubt? Why are you so vehemently defending Hamas and giving them the benefit of the doubt?

                    Al Jazeera, a marked “not western press outlet” has even called it out.

                    Al Jazeera has provided primary evidence and declared that there’s a genocide in China? Or have they just reported that Adrian Zenz and Australian Strategic Policy Institute have?

                    based on a multitude of input

                    Such as…?

                    I’m just kidding, I know you just mean “based on vibes”. Why do you trust a source when they say there’s a genocide in China but reject them when they say there isn’t in Gaza? Pure vibes.

                    And if not, feel free to actually answer the question.

                    (nor does it make them right).

                    Really? Then why do you unquestioningly insist that they’re right?