Chinese women have had it. Their response to Beijing’s demands for more children? No. 

Fed up with government harassment and wary of the sacrifices of child-rearing, many young women are putting themselves ahead of what Beijing and their families want. Their refusal has set off a crisis for the Communist Party, which desperately needs more babies to rejuvenate China’s aging population.

With the number of babies in free fall—fewer than 10 million were born in 2022, compared with around 16 million in 2012—China is headed toward a demographic collapse. China’s population, now around 1.4 billion, is likely to drop to just around half a billion by 2100, according to some projections. Women are taking the blame.

In October, Chinese Leader Xi Jinping urged the state-backed All-China Women’s Federation to “prevent and resolve risks in the women’s field,” according to an official account of the speech.

“It’s clear that he was not talking about risks faced by women but considering women as a major threat to social stability,” said Clyde Yicheng Wang, an assistant professor of politics at Washington and Lee University who studies Chinese government propaganda.

The State Council, China’s top government body, didn’t respond to questions about Beijing’s population policies.

  • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I honestly feel we need to set a limit to human lifespan. Healthcare is advancing too fast for this to be sustainable.

    Bro, you lived 75 years, please die already so new generations can have some resources for themselves, stop hogging everything, you… hogger. Lower the retirement age to 55 and let people enjoy their last 20 years with decent retirement money because there’s less old people to maintain.

    This is the only solution I can think of. If the population keeps growing at this rate and we don’t start culling ourselves, we’ll make the planet inhabitable.

    Young people are necessary for the economy to bloom and to sustain old people after retirement. I don’t think sterilization is an option.

    • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      No one wants to die at 75 - that’s a single decade (in old age, mind you, with limited options) to enjoy retirement. IF you managed to retire. There’s a lot of older people now that I work with that simply can’t retire, because they can’t afford it. That’s only going to get worse as we grow old and need to retire.

      We can’t enact Logan’s Run at 75 and assume it’ll fix anything. We’ll all work till we drop, which I don’t want for my children. Hell, my parents don’t want that for me now!

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I feel like they’d have a point if we could reduce the standard retirement age. Theoretically, a world pushing increased automation should be able to achieve that - assuming the value generated from automation isn’t going into about 5 or 6 individual bank accounts.

      • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Their retirement money sucks because there are too many of them. Because there are too many of them, young people have no resources. Because young people have no resources, people don’t want to have kids. Because they don’t have kids, there aren’t enough young workers to generate decent retirement money for old people.

        It’s a cycle.

        It’s really the best solution…

        • Promotes young people to procreate
        • Helps the planet with overpopulation
        • Removes the people who are no longer giving back to society
        • Gives better retirement years to people who reach age 55.
        • Lowers the prices of properties because most properties are held by older people.
        • Removes the portion of the population with declining minds. It’s like eugenics without discrimination. It applies equally to everyone. Enjoy your 75 years and let others enjoy theirs.

        Seriously, I can only see positives. The only problem is that people are too attached to life. Humans are too self-centered for something like this. 75 years is enough to experience whatever. You’ll retire younger and have actual money to enjoy your last 20 years.

        This is a temporary solution though. The population would still grow, but at least it would be mostly workers that are probably figuring out how to solve the issues permanently.

        • deafboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d go further. Imagine if we extended the purge to the young population as well. They’d no longer need to work hard to give their children stability and a chance to succeed. No wars, no famine, no sickens… no suffering. All that, achievable right now! All it takes is to kill ourselves!

          https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4146128/

          • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            One day we’ll look back and wonder “why did we even think it was possible for human population to keep growing without limits in a limited space with limited resources?”

            Wait, that day already happened years ago.

            The 1 child policy already proved to be the wrong solution. Do you have any other ideas on how to stop the population growth while keeping the population young?

            We have tripled our population in 50 years. Life expectancy is higher than ever and will keep getting higher.

            Solutions? Or do we just sit down mocking reality until we die?

        • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Or just take residential property away from companies and sell it back way cheaper to first time buyers. I bet lots of people would like a kid or two but just can’t afford it because of all the money spent on rent/mortgages.