The marketplace of ideas is a flawed concept and always has been. Economists with years of specialized training and decades of experience can’t agree on the best course of actions, how is it reasonable to expect Joe the plumber to make an informed choice by watching an hour long debate?

Draw a circle in gimp is sort of uninuitive.

Good assessment, thanks

360 deg is exactly the same as 0 deg. .

Dude. Regulatory agencies are corrupt as heck. There’s no incentive to be a good auditor and actually dig deep to find issues and lots of incentive to have no findings. They’re all buddies with the management.

Shower thought: what if a large number of people made lots of posts and comments on reddit using only AI generated content?

People are mad to realize something they thought was spiritual and purely human can be reduced to a mathematical algorithm and be generated by machines.

Some claim they’re mad that it’s because the training looked at art without permission to develop the algorithm (which everyone knows all artist do, making those people look like complete hypocrites), but that just sped it up. It would have happened eventually anyway, because the fact is, art is not spiritual or uniquely human, it’s patterns and shapes, which computers are great at.

Contributions that aren’t explicitly Marxist are heavily down voted. Overall the atmosphere is less neutral and less helpful.

French is a dead language, just admit it and move on with your lives already Quebec.

Hope they open source the tech or pirates get a hold of it.

Thank you

Any article summary?

That’s dumb. I understand restrictions on uncooked meats, but what harm could a cooked chicken breast do? This is what happens when officials blindly enforce rules without understanding the purpose of the rule in the first place.

Overcooked? Also jail.

This is my recollection, when chrome first came out it seemed significantly faster than IE and Firefox at the time, and Google was much less evil big brother at the time.

“You take one nap in a ditch in the park, and people start declaring you this and that!”

Fining people for not wearing a seat belt I dont support. Victimless crime.

I agree that fines are not an effective deterrent for crime. Very rich people don’t have much income though (elon musk, for example, i think reports $0 income a year, most of their money comes from capital gains or debt against their assets) and poor people have so little income it will probably encourage lawbreaking, which is probably also not desired, so I don’t really support income based fines. It doesn’t seem to accomplish the objective effectively. Perhaps loss of privileges would be more effective, such as losing your license to drive.

Green card is permanent residence, you’re confusing it with H1B Visa