Well on firefox/chrome extensions you can search for text expander and choose an extension that works for you.

Or if you are using a phone you can do the same on the app store and I think there should be a few options.

Once you download one of them it should give instructions on how to use it, but in general it asks you to create a phrase that you want to be automatically triggered and a shorter phrase that automatically replaced with the longer phrase.

For example-

long phrase: The quick brown fox jumped over the moon.

short phrase: /qfox

and every time you typed /qfox it would replace it with “The quick brown fox jumped over the moon.”

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Yeah the more people the better so its easier to have a class action lawsuit.

Also for me I’m using a text expander so that after I type a shortcut it automatically adds the rest of the text for me.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

I mostly mention that to fend off the people that use the main basis of their argument as the effectiveness because that’s not why I’m doing it.

I do think it could work legally if the courts want to remain consistent, but that isn’t guaranteed.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

yeah they were. I hope more people start doing it even if it doesn’t legally hold water its still a good way to show that fediverse users won’t stand for that.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Agreed. Once you start blocking culture to only those who can afford it you start losing culture once it becomes unprofitable.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

How does it make the decision to recommend one post over another using the data it collects? Also does it treat all that data differently when ranking posts?

btw it feels really well polished so nice job.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Any picture/video/text that is tries to present facts or events without sources should be dismissed (unless they are facts or events that you have previously verified for yourself). At least with a source you can reason about motives, resources, etc. to get a better picture of what is being pushed and why.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Is it possible for you to use a mbin server instead? I think it is a fork that has more active development going on around it.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

No clue.

My theories:

1. A lot of people like threads.net
2. They don’t like I asked for a source
3. Or they don’t like the copyleft license

Because that’s literally all the information my comment gives.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Thx.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Good that threads.net is in top 50 but I would’ve liked to see it higher. Right now it is at 39th place.

Edit: Also what is the source for the picture?

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

I guess we are going to be in for more SEO spam than usual if this document is accurate. But I think its good that we are finally going to get a better understanding how Google manipulates people with the algorithm.

So a win-lose situation.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

I can’t blame some New Caledonians for wanting to remain a part of France.

The people that are affected by the racism want to be independent and the people that aren’t want to stay a part of France. So the cost isn’t spread evenly, that’s why there is this huge problem in the first place.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Yeah from what I understand the situation there is complicated. A majority of the people that live in New Caledonia want to stay a part of France and that majority is made of mostly the Europeans and the other migrants.

However the Kanak are socioeconomically disadvantaged compared to the rest of the state and they feel like they aren’t being represented enough (due to a slim minority) on what they consider aboriginal land (even though other people have been living there for a long time too).

It is a weird situation.

Edit: added (due to a slim minority)

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

That’s a smaller population than I thought. I thought maybe a half a million at least but I guess not.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Changed

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

I used the auto-generated title for this but realized that the actual title looks different so should I change it?

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Ah well then I might try and find a license that doesn’t require attribution because I don’t care about that part. But the rest seem exactly what I’m going for.

Edit: grammar

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Well first thing is that the license is a copyleft license so it is still allowed to be used, distributed, etc. the only real difference between this license and public domain (as far as I know) is me saying that I don’t want it being used for commercial purposes that’s it.

Also for me its more just a way for me to say fuck you to everything having to be commercialized so even if it doesn’t hold legal water I don’t care.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

I think that in the long term that there is one thing going for the truth: It is more coherent and more predictive of what is to come next.

If a country does a campaign that tries to fabricate a story from scratch if they aren’t very careful there will be some form of incoherence eventually if there is any slip up. That’s why its always easier to just frame the truth in positive or negative lights instead because it removes the need to try and create coherent stories.

And yes I know that there are people that believe incoherent truths about the world but that is mainly because it doesn’t actually affect most of the actions that they take on a day to day basis so they don’t have an actual incentive to improve their understanding of the world. If they need to make decisions based on that information they will make bad decisions until their understanding of the world has changed or they are out competed by people with more accurate beliefs.

T.L.D.R.

Lies take consistent effort to keep straight and eventually they’ll fuck up, Spin is easier and more effective for changing values, and people tend to have more accurate beliefs if they are actually useful to have them.

Edit: grammar

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}