Aaaah, I would love it if people had to carry a visible law-mandated label saying “May contain bigotted and un-read-up (i.e. dumb), toxic opinions about all things” unless they pass some psychological exam.

Brave new world.

So you think Adobe is too big and should be split up?

Freedom requires effort, and always did.

Maybe more lately, but such is life

Did nobody read the manual?

IEEE 754 double precision: The 53-bit significand precision gives from 15 to 17 significant decimal digits precision.

EV battery recycling is too valuable not to happen.

You’re literally saying you are happy paying half the price and not owning anything.

You could have at least bought the tools new and sold them after for a net maybe 5% loss…

Proton works wonderfully these days.

You are not wrong that a lot of shady things can happen with military power. It is a fine general statement.

But with regards to NATO, I think you are misinformed (or mixed up?). If all those were invasions (and NATO is so strong), I don’t see how any of these countries could be independent countries now.

Ah, yes, the scary defense-only alliance. Purely by design it doesn’t have the lawful capacity to do any of the things you said, and single members (US or UK) don’t represent it.

Ah yes, no advancements in Ukraine where 1/3 of the country is under occupier control and in entrenched positions.

Based.

Although I agree, people seem to write as if they generally accepted the official narrative without much of a fight.

I like you

One aspect: I feel once you start thinking about having a family (and not being a farting old decrepid mess by the time your children are 20yo) you really start looking for someone who can be committed and would be interested in starting one, and that really doesn’t include hot 20yo girls.

Another: People who age gracefully show they can take care of themselves and look amazing any age. That is powerful. Combined with the fact 25+ have a much better sense of style and manners, and understand the world so much more in a nuanced way.

You really double-plopped there.

And yet, after many decades of solar, wind construction. It is the energy source in that pie chart that is sizeable (just as much as all wind and solar) and extremely stable (probably for the last 50 years), without any major construction in the past 30 years minimum.

I was agreeing with you… In the part that criminalization increases social isolation… It was just a remark towards @Sweetpeaches69, who tries reductio-ad-absurdum, which for weed (like any substance) has negative effects on the body, and mind (and in it’s specific case the mixture of the two - brain).

I was mostly trying to tell about the biggest impact of weed I can see (and so I write) is the use during difficult times in life (nobody became an addict out of a fulfilling and good life, fairly sure it is a saying even in English?) can exacerbate life problems.

Yes… from the perspective themelm argues. Any drug/substance can throw you in a downward spiral if you dont have a reason for living, meaning in your life.

Maybe you wanted this word: sleezy

They should not censor the company name.

We just have to have a personalized AI to read the news for you and give you a condensed “important bits you would find” version. Which you ignore because you’re not that into the news that comes out lately. Cue dead internet theory again for the #789 time.

Mutual exclusion means either one is true or the other, but not both. But also what he said has no two specific concepts? What do you mean?

Banning because of advertiser / regulator / government populism vs. It not being political?