Sure thing, as I say your initial point stands.

For the sake of discussion only I ask “what is the point of achieving insight if it is too difficult to communicate it to others?”

If it understands you without you even trying then regardless of whether you try to communicate well or not you will never know if you have done a good or poor job of communicating. This is my point.

Your unpopular opinion that you enjoy it more is not in question, and you are free to abandon your fellow mortals if that’s what you want to do. However, in my opinion, this can only lead to a further deterioration in skills that you already admit are not as developed as you would like.

I would also gently remind you that you are one of us, and subject to the same imperfections. Keeping this in mind can help smooth your interactions with others.

“Someone disagreeing with you, or attempting to show you something you might not know or have seen”

So this is another example of how you are doing the same things you avoid communicating with humans over. You have selected one part of my statement to misunderstand and selectively ignored the point.

We absolutely are talking about what you wanted to talk about. Your first statement to me was asking what I based my assessment that you were training yourself to be a poor communicator on. Since then we have stuck to that topic, but you haven’t really addressed the central point that a machine that adapts to things that hinder communication with humans will inevitably train you not to correct or address those hindrances.

This isn’t me disagreeing with you, it is me pointing out something you might not have considered. However you have framed this whole discussion as a case of you being misunderstood. That really isn’t the case.

Regardless of why the bot is able to adapt to vagueness (or other communication problems), the fact that it can discourages you from overcoming those problems.

Someone diagreeing withyou, or attempting to show you some other thing you might not have thought of or seen for yourself, is not always a misunderstanding. You need to entertain the possibility that sometimes you are wrong, unaware of something, or simply misunderstanding the other person yourself.

You say yourself that you use the vaguest descriptions when talking to the bot and that it fills in the blanks for you… This is not a good way to practice speaking with human beings.

The fact that you assumed I was talking about grammar is indicative of the problem. You clearly dislike others assuming you are talking about something you are not talking about, yet you do it yourself. That’s because misunderstandings are normal and learning to deal with them is an essential part of good communication.

It carries the emotions and personal biases of the source material It was trained on.

It sounds like you are training yourself to be a poor communicator, abandoning any effort to become more understandable to actual humans.

IE regulatory capture and soothing bullshit?

Step 1: do not poop for three days straight

Greater Belearia

There is no intelligent operator in a neuron

The Chinese Room by Searle

So, you agree people should not start drinking Coca Cola, and for their own health and finances they should make every effort to stop drinking Coca Cola.

Are you suggesting people should not be encouraged to quit smoking?

In no universe is coca cola “all you can afford”. You could replace it with tap water and be better off in every way.

You could always not buy their completely non essential products, but suggesting that rarely gets a good reception from the “obsessively whining about straws” crows.

Yeah, but no one had to “rebrand” anything. They have always been experiences.

dude, eating good food with others and travelling really are experiences. No branding is necessary.

I mean, you didn’t read the post did you?

les 'ricains

Some obscure Puerto Rican who is alive today but nobody has heard of yet.