• fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    It warms my heart to hear young folks not buy into the infinite treadmill of consumption.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      it comes at a social cost though.

      i have lost a lot of friends because I live below my ‘means’. whereas most folks I meet are ‘struggling’ because they are living beyond theirs.

      Especially travel and restaurants. consumption is now re-branded as ‘experience’.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          they are consumer goods like any other.

          you can cook a meal at home and travel locally. but few are interested in this because it is not a ‘display of wealth’, the way your week in Bali is or your tiktok dining blog.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just don’t mention that it’s what makes the stock market go round or people lose their shit when they realize you can’t retire at 65 by magically making money from hoarding it through compound interest.

  • Zorque@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    “the young people”

    So they’ve stopped calling everyone under the age of 45 millennials?

    • Agrivar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ooof, that stings. I’ve been thrifty and anti-consumer for years, but I’m also 50. I hate admitting I’m no longer one of “the young people.”

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    stop making shitty stuff that will only last a couple of years we are perfectly fucking capable of it

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      No.

      It’s as simple as stop buying shit you don’t need, and rather than buy new stuff, replace/fix/renew old stuff.

      Like… stop buying a new car on lease every 2/3 years. buy a car and keep it for 10+ years.

      Stop vacationing to foreign countries, go on a road trip. etc

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      first of all, the irony in this comment is incredible. Second of all, literally just start buying used shit first and foremost (it’s already out there, using it is better for the environment) and if you do buy something new, try and buy something that you know you can get a good lifetime out of.

      have a proper sit down, and think about what you really need to keep going in life. Focus on that. I’m not saying you should drop every hobby you’ve ever had, but if you collect newly released shit, maybe pivot into finding older stuff that’s interesting to collect. If one of your hobbies has a consumable material/s maybe think about how you can better fill that gap. Perhaps try a different hobby every once in a while.

      I’ve always enjoyed computer hardware, i recently got my hands on a few older thinkpad models. x20 series and an x50 series. Both used, both seen some shit in their day and age. Gave me a handful of usable laptops, most of the parts i bought for them were used. All of them are fantastic machines though.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        E-Books are a thing, as are libraries, which allow you to borrow a book and return it. You also have the option of buying books second hand and then sell it again or give it away. That is really one of the key parts of degrowth. As soon as you share things, you need less things as a group. Hence the impact is much lower.

        Besides a paperback book has a climate impact of 1kg of CO2. The average US American emits 4.6t per year just by driving their car. The impact of reading books is a complete joke against that and again no libraries, no second hand or anything else to reduce the impact.

        Also books are really incredibly usefull resources. They are much better at actually explaining more complex ideas, then shorter articles.

        So please do not just presume, somebody is going out to buy something. For the most part the big choices an individual can make on personal consumption are housing, transport and diet.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          i know i just thought it was funny, let me have my 7 words or however many they are, of amusement smh.

          I mentioned second hand stuff, as well as other non physical methods of cosumption in my comment, so some of this is quite redundant. The tidbit on carbon emissions is interesting though.

          Also books are really incredibly usefull resources. They are much better at actually explaining more complex ideas, then shorter articles.

          i mean yeah, i just don’t know how much one would need to explain the concept of “hey just don’t buy things, or if you do minimize the impact of it.” But that’s just me i suppose.

          So please do not just presume, somebody is going out to buy something.

          i guess so, but owning things is an inevitability in a materialist society. Even if you’re homeless, you’re still going to own something, even if it’s just the clothes on your back. Seems like the most obvious first step to the concept of “degrowth” to me. I suppose continual consumption could be a bigger deal, but most of that is unavoidable (eating food for example) though you can still optimize it, i feel like that should be much more obvious frankly, considering how much we do it every day at the very least.

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.netOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            i mean yeah, i just don’t know how much one would need to explain the concept of “hey just don’t buy things, or if you do minimize the impact of it.” But that’s just me i suppose.

            Thats because degrowth is not just anti consumerism although it is part of it, but to limit economic growth to stay within planetary boundaries. This means that degrowth also wants to built up systems to stop over consumption for everybody, while providing everybody with a good quality of life. This is far from simple, since we currently overuse earths resources, while billions are starving, despite us having enough food to feed everybody with ease. So you end up with stuff like universal basic income, forced recycling systems, commons, global justice, measuring well being and a lot more. There is easily enough to write a book about.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              that’s fair i suppose, i wouldn’t call it degrowth though. I’d call it global economic minimalism or something. Degrowth is pretty broad, but then again people probably aren’t going to buy a book titled “economic minimalism” are they? Lol.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          that’s true, i forget about them pretty frequently on account of the whole modern society thing. I have no idea if they would even have more recent releases tbh lol.

          Though i guess you could probably go through your library to acquire it anyway?

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Y’all are no longer buying new stuff to take care of the environment. I’m not buying new stuff because everything costs an arm and a leg plus taxes. We’re not quite the same I guess.

  • Hegar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    What’s are some of yall’s less obvious “always buy second hand” items?

    Crockery, cutlery, pressure cookers and computer peripherals are some things I think it makes no sense to buy new. 2nd hand they’re usually under a tenth the price and often better quality.

    I’ve heard some arguments that buying 2nd hand cars is usually better for the climate owing to how much of a car’s lifetime carbon generation is the manufacturing.

    • dankm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you actually need one (most don"t), I wouldn’t buy a truck sold on the North American market since about 2005.

      • Agrivar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Even if you do need a truck, most of the models marketed here are stupidly oversized in all the areas that DON’T matter. As a builder, I don’t need to be lifted into the stratosphere and have a teeny-tiny bed! I want to be able to fit an entire sheet of plywood in the bed and two people in the cab… ideally without having to hoist myself up into the seat!

    • JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tools! With the exception of a few big power tools like a table saw or miter saw, where the new safety features make it worthwhile, I get everything I can used. I prefer stuff passed down from family with sentimental value, but I get a lot of my tools from Everything is Free, junk stores, yard sales, estate clean outs, swap shops etc.

      Older tools tend to be simpler, easier to fix, and remarkably sturdy. I’ve read that the metallurgy wasn’t as good sixty+ years ago so they overbuilt them a bit to compensate, and then decades of use weaned out the weaker ones, so anything left still working is basically survivorship-bias guaranteed. I’ve got a drill press that’s been in the family for four generations and will probably outlast my grandkids.

      They’re cheaper, sturdier, easier to fix, generally well-documented online (sometimes better than the new stuff), and they don’t come with sheaves of unnecessary styrofoam and plastic packaging. And they have history and stories in them, even if I don’t always know what those stories are.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The better quality is the key here. The shit made today are intentionally made to be replaced.

      Pyrex is the best example. The old-school Pyrex logo means it’s made from really tough glass whereas the newer logo means it’s shit and will shatter when going from hot to cold (oven to countertop).

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      getting a fuel efficent compact car, new or used, is what is best.

      way way too many have huge gas guzzlers, used or old. your 1990 4Runner that gets 10mpg and has horrible emissions isn’t saving the environment.

    • dirtySourdough@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Definitely most furniture (i.e., without cushions so you avoid bed bugs). New furniture is incredibly expensive and (seems to be) lower quality. Second hand furniture can still be expensive but it’s usually heavily discounted, especially if someone is trying to get rid of it quickly.

      Local thrift shops are a good option of course, but also try garage/yard sales, Craigslist, OfferUp, etc. If your area has estate sales you can find some pretty killer deals on good furniture there too.

    • nikita@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Clothes, furniture, equipment related to hobbies… Most things

      Honestly a better question might be what do people prefer buying new?

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Man it just gets dumber the more times I read what you said. I hope you’re at least self aware enough that you don’t consider yourself an intellectual on any level.