Kobolds with a keyboard.

  • 1 Post
  • 135 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle




  • I’d consider one, but it’d have to pay considerably more. Like, 50% or more above what I’d otherwise expect for a fully remote position, and it would have to be an easy commute.

    In most cases it’s adding 20-30% to the length of the work day when the commute is included, plus costs of transportation itself. Plus the general inconvenience and the fact that it’s almost always going to mean a more toxic culture. But if the pay and benefits were absolutely fantastic, I’d consider it, at least short-term.




  • The canopic jars are actually early battery designs. They were much more efficient than any batteries we have today - they produced almost unlimited energy and were very cheap and easy to make (just look at how many there are), but the government (which is secretly run by lizard people by the way, do your own research and educate yourself) covered it up and created the BURIAL CHAMBER MYTH to keep us reliant on fossil fuels.







  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.socialtoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldThis, but unironically
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    While this is a nice thought in theory, it breaks down as soon as you start actually thinking of it in practical terms.

    • Some rural road that gets a few cars a day at best does not really need sidewalks and certainly does not need bike lanes.
    • A road with potholes is more dangerous to pedestrians and bikers due to the potential for cars to lose control, or for drivers to swerve to miss a pothole and potentially endanger other travelers.
    • Adding bike lanes and sidewalks is just impractical in a lot of areas. Where is that space coming from, when private property extends to the road edge currently? Are we just declaring eminent domain and taking 3-6 feet of everyone’s property frontage for this initiative? I’m sure that will be a very unpopular initiative. What about areas where buildings are too close to the street to allow for this? There’s just too many areas where it’s not practical or possible to do.

    I’m all for phasing out cars in areas where it’s reasonable to do so, but your proposal just isn’t compatible with reality.







  • Having to be OK with them going into our bathrooms, not knowing if they could be a predator or not

    Let me ask you something. You just outlined how much time, money and effort someone has to put into trying to transition. Hormone pills (and all of the problems that come with that), a change of wardrobe, a change in how they’re asking people to view and refer to them… Dealing with people like you, who look down on them for trying it… Hate from far right groups, persecution from some governments… General social stigma…

    Do you really think someone is going to go through all of that, and more that you haven’t even covered here, just so they can walk into a women’s room to… do whatever it is you’re afraid they’re doing? Really? I think the chances are better that any random woman you run into in the bathroom is a predator, honestly.