![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/d1879120-15ae-4c7c-a202-0dca9f7feccb.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0130a5eb-ebd6-402a-961b-6dc94d9541ca.jpeg)
The firmament is just the sky.
The firmament is just the sky.
Literally me.
This is news just as much as any celebrity news is.
There’s a way to prove it; we know how quickly pain signals propagate through our nerves and how quickly nukes disintegrate matter. The degree of skepticism you’d need to be uncertain about it would cause you to need to resolve solipsism before you allowed nukes to even exist. There’s a certain radius within which, if you don’t have sufficient shielding there’s no possibility of pain. There’s another smaller radius for which no amount of shielding will change the outcome.
I’m not entertaining the idea that shifting to a critique of a specific aspect of the game is the same as claiming it’s “boring”.
Also, I think the way they paced out the increases in mobility is one of the game’s stronger aspects. In the context of a large explorable world, making walking speed too high will destroy the challenge and pacing of the game like nothing else. The overworld is enormous with appropriately scaled terrain that’s magnificent and glorious to behold. If you’re not taking the time to look around and appreciate the scenery, I can understand why you’d say it’s “boring”, but maybe consider that it’s not for you and move on instead of pretending your opinions are able to predict how appealing people find it.
generally a boring game
I and lots of other people like it quite a lot.
How the fuck?!
No, but I’ve argued with enough people IRL to know that my opinion isn’t exactly common. Most people who agree with me are my fellow transhumanists.
If everyone were immortal, and no one needed to worry about resources, that would be awesome and pretending otherwise is the biggest cope.
Idk, if someone’s trying to do a mass shooting, a little intervention could do some good.
Yes; I misunderstood what the author meant. Ty for letting me know.
Does the author think LLMs are Artificial General Intelligence? Because they’re definitely not.
AGI is, at minimum capable of taking input and giving output from any domain that a human can, which no generative neural network is currently capable of. For one thing, generative networks are incapable of reciting facts reliably, which immediately disqualifies them.
I’m making a play on the “can confirm” reply format by mixing it with the dichotomy question “confirm/deny”
I’m saying that what you described isn’t therapeutic, and I know that because I do exactly that when I have migraines.
This face looks back at you.
Can deny. Source: suffer from severe migraines.
Iirc, acupuncture was shown to be good at relieving pain, and basically nothing else.
I’ve noticed quite a few, yes.
Don’t do Sonic dirty like that.
I cannot legally endorse this statement.