Yes. Everyone knows soda is extremely healthy. It’s pretty much good for every major organ system! Kidneys, bones, pancreas, soda, soda, soda!
Yes. Everyone knows soda is extremely healthy. It’s pretty much good for every major organ system! Kidneys, bones, pancreas, soda, soda, soda!
What? No no no. Clearly soda is the healthy option. You can never be too cautious.
We need to kill the nickel too.
I think you mean “pretty fuckin sweet!” Coin currency master race!
Easy. Slap on an annual registration fee directly proportional to weight. Shit, just make it half the sale weight of the car for any non-EV, and half that again for EVs. Peg the ratio to inflation after that.
It is actually noteworthy because Windows is forcing users to have a particular piece of useless hardware for “security” reasons.
I think most of us here are concerned with foreign adversary interference as much as we are concerned with corporate interference and espionage. The law seems to only address the surface level issue (ownership) and none of the actual problems (action).
Weakness: complete overkill for most of the problems in your life.
Weakness: better done in advance, before you even realized you needed that knowledge to solve some other problem.
Weakness: Immediate cash rewards unlikely.
I want them to actually chuck a handful of small spacecrafts as far as they possibly can in orthogonal directions, then have them take parallax images for the nearest pulsars we don’t have direct distance measurements of. It would be nice to push back the sphere of distances we’ve measured that way.
There’s plenty of ways to do it. The simplest would be to quintuple the size of the house and elect five winners to every district. Literally nothing else would have to change. Five member districts are considered the smallest that are functionally immune to gerrymandering efforts.
A more reasonable suggestion is to start implementing these reforms on the state and local level, where referendums are possible and you have an easier time building a big enough organization to actually get shit done.
As for Approval vs RCV, the simplest answer is that they usually agree on the results [all the way down the line]https://electionscience.org/commentary-analysis/super-tuesday-deep-voting-methods-dive/), but approval is simpler and easier in every respect. Both systems tend to produce a candidate support graph that looks like exponential decay in real life. The complicated answer gets into voting theory/math and all sorts of technical criterion. While I think those arguments are valid, most poling and real world data seem to show that basically anything other than “choose one” is good enough, so I prefer the method that is easiest to explain to voters and hardest for candidates to claim shenanigans.
They’re all getting way more money looking for oil.
Hey kids, you wanna try vaccines?
Without switching to multi-winner elections, the voting system will do very little. My preference is Approval Voting for single-seat elections and Proportional Approval Voting for multi-winner elections.
You’re never going to eliminate gerrymandering without switching to proportional representation. I prefer to use Sequential Proportional Approval Voting, which is just Approval Voting with extra steps.
My two suggestions for OP are:
Simplify and focus the list. It’s too long and touches too many different topics. Also, when you do have a full list with every topic, separate them by category.
As stated above, use Approval Voting and Proportional Representation.
Did you not read the last paragraph, where they mentioned that it might not have value for OP directly, but their coworkers see value in it anyway?
A single point of failure when it comes to safety is a bad idea. We’re all idiots every once in a while, and layered safety helps reduce the number of dumb mistakes we make, like trying to eat soap.
You can take my Cinnamon GUI from my cold dead hands.
Cycling through buttons, atl+tab, Ctrl+tab, some other fourth thing.
This, but unironically.
What the heck does “does not do organizational structure” even mean? Valve must have some kind of structure.