Yeah. After that everything can be done with !sh
.
(Edit: This is a joke. There’s a lot of reasons not to do this.)
Yeah. After that everything can be done with !sh
.
(Edit: This is a joke. There’s a lot of reasons not to do this.)
Oh. This is seriously cool. Thank you.
Oh! You meant Moore’s Law is asymptotic!?
Yes! That is key to the joke I was making.
When I say Big O, I’m talking about the slick jazzy anime about rejecting true love and living with heartbreak because we believe a lie about our own superiority. This is always true, no matter what the discussion context. If I happen to say anything remotely relevant to mathematical Big O, that is just a deeply weird coincidence.
Write more robust code.
Sure, I could read a book about best practices and Big O…but…What if we just table the idea for a few iterations of Moore’s Law instead?
This gives off a strong “I have black friends.” vibe.
Are we just not going to talk about this one?
…
Yeah. That’s probably for the best.
But what if someone else’s government creates the Torment Nexus before ours can?!
Yes, a degrading phone case can do that.
The arbitrary standard for the censorship in Fediverse is extremely bad.
“The pirates code… Be more like… guidelines.”
As a Perl user who won’t shut up about it… Yeah. Yeah, that’s pretty fair.
This is great.
If I could make one change, there’s so many funnier languages that could have been Esperanto. I would have taken a shameless jab at F#, myself.
The big ones that affect gaming are removing and reinstalling various runtimes (C++, .Net, Python, Java).
In most cases just getting them all installed side by side by side is great for both development and gaming.
But once in awhile, I just got a favorite game working, and it relies on the exact redistributable that I need to upgrade, tweak or reinstall to try out a new code library.
After procrastinating a couple times from such experiments, I started running separate gaming and dev boxes whenever possible.
This also my answer, but better explained than I would have.
This one is proof that the border between bad taxidermy and awesome taxidermy is razor thin.
I personally, haven’t been successful mixing my gaming rig with my main development machine.
To really succeed as a developer, I’ve sometimes needed to be willing to make risky changes to my development machine, that I’m not willing to do to my gaming machine.
If I absolutely had to, I could make it work. But I wouldn’t do it on purpose.
CAH Products for those whose values match with buying land to prevent border wall bullshit and suing SpaceX.
Dang. That’s quite the cast.
This could be so good or so bad.
This is just begging for a kernel memory space access joke…
Exactly. So there’s no way to measure the exact egg that was first born to a species we would not recognize as a chicken.
Further, we might each choose a different arbitrary egg and declare that eggs parent “not a chicken”.
But for this question, that doesn’t have to matter.
If we can all agree that something in the ancestry of the modern chicken was not a chicken, and agree that it was likely still birthed from an egg, then we can conclude that that egg came first.
Even if we cannot agree about which exact egg hatched into the first chicken, or which exact animal was the first chicken, we can agree on their relationship such that we can agree that any selected “first chicken egg” came before any selected “first chicken” to be born from it.
The hardest part of this proposition is whether we can agree that the first chicken was born inside an egg. I propose that it must have been, by our own definitioms, because we widely agree that chickens are born from eggs. Not by any intrinsic property, but simply by our accepted definition of the word “chicken”.
So any hypothetical chicken-ancestor we choose as the “first chicken”, but not born from an egg, we should not be willing to call “first chicken”, after all.
So we must proceed forward in time from that failed choice of “first chicken” until something sufficiently chicken-like is born from an egg. Then we can call that animal our “first chicken”, and examine it’s relationship to “chicken eggs”. We will, by our method of searching, always then find that the “chicken egg” that our “first chicken” hatched from, came first.