Why respond in bad faith like this? You’re clearly playing dumb.

Really having a hard time addressing the topic at hand, aren’t you?

Already did in another comment in this thread, take a look. Cited with the link to the paper.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1635092/ <— by all means, look up similar studies done in more recent years and you’ll find the same fundamental patterns.

Did you reply to the right person? I’m not sure how your comment is relevant to mine. I’m well aware of why public transit is poorly funded and developed.

The vast majority of the time a woman is murdered, it’s at the hands of a man. Yes.

men*

I’ve heard some pretty weird ass views from vegans about the diet of Indigenous people who’ve traditionally relied on hunting and trapped.

Maybe if every town in the country has properly funded public transit that was safe and reliable, we’d see less situations like this.

My city’s of public transit is a joke and we wonder why there’s so many drunk drivers. Can’t even sleep off the booze in your car without getting a DUI from some dickhead cop.

Extensive public transit hardly means functional. And women are far more likely to be harassed/abused on public transit than men.

Pretty weird that you’re baselessly accusing this person of doing similar things just for asking whether or not she’s doing this in the absence of a viable transportation alternative.

Like why are people on this site such dicks? It’s way past Reddit levels of snark and it just makes for a shitty experience here. It’s like hanging out with a bunch of jaded and snarky IT guys.

I’m no fan of shitty drivers and I think if we live in a world where license suspensions are a thing, that’s fine but don’t be surprised when stuff like this happens when public transit sucks. It may exist but there’s a reason why a lot of folks prefer their car over poorly funded public transit.

The studio that developed this game is disgustingly sexist. Can’t say I’d ever spend $$$ supporting devs that are so weirdly proud about being sexist wannabe macho assholes.

Fruit of the Loom makes nice t-shirts too. Wore them as a kid and now as an adult.

I have 2 types of shirts-- shirts for when I go out, and shirts for when I’m at home or mostly at home. I like the former to stay completely clean, and I like the latter to be comprised of 1+ year old t-shirts that can get dirty/stained without worry.

I’m saying both arguments are speculative.

“All due respect”, this is pure speculation.

This entire discussion is pure speculation-- are you really going to be that guy who says "but not my comment!"?

I feel like you’re completely leaving out the gap that there will between what we’ve achieved now vs 1000 years from now. If there’s advanced life out there that’s been around for long enough, I don’t think it’s biased to say that there’s a chance their tech is far more advanced than ours. I understand what you’re saying, but let’s not pretend we’re the true generation where there won’t be any major breakthroughs. There will be, but they’ll just take longer than before. To make technological leaps comparable from the 1800s to now, it may very well take from now to the year 3000, but the point is the notion that we’re past the point of major leaps is unfounded and based on the false notion that I’m saying in 300 years we can expect technological leaps as large as we’ve seen in the last 300 years.

All due respect, our current theories are probably downright primitive to any advanced life form and there’s undoubtedly blind spots in modern day science, be it in any field.

Phone calls used to be such a quick, convenient way to talk or get info and uselessly governments have paved the way for scam companies to completely ruin the modern day phone call.

The site you posted is damn near unreadable on my phone.

The future fucking sucks. I hate the enshittification of the internet.

T-shirts. Get a 5 pack each of white, black, and another color you like. There, you’re set for like a year for $30.