No wonder they matched him with JT.
He’d draw on a weather map with a sharpie too,
Literally do and say anything, no matter how ridiculous, to not ever admit a mistake.
No wonder they matched him with JT.
He’d draw on a weather map with a sharpie too,
Literally do and say anything, no matter how ridiculous, to not ever admit a mistake.
Usually you can access it through the obd2 port.
But realistically, there’s no reason why you can’t design the hydraulics in a way that the cylinder is always leaking through an orifice and the dump trailer is constantly slowly lowering itself unless you are actively holding the Up button. There’s never a case where a truck needs to hold it’s dump up in the air for long periods of time.
All trucks support J1939 TSC1 message.
Nah, all trucks transmit their speed on the CAN network. It’s very simple to implement.
No. Every couple years we get inquiries for it, but they don’t want to pay to have it installed.
I just Akria my way around town on a bike.
I have no problems just zooming around and through vehicles in Cyberpunk. It’s fun and relaxing.
twice-yearly
I wonder why they went with that, instead of saying bi-annually
Even now, it says nothing about letting AI watch them.
If these companies used youtube videos in a way that circumvented their revenue stream in any way, then yeah, absolutely that’s a problem. But that’s a completely different issue not related to who/what is consuming the video
does not make it permissible for a human to cause the LLM to train on that data without permission of the rights holder
Says who? These videos are out there for people (or things) to see.
If someone was playing some videos to train their dog to to respond to a noise, what business is that of the rights holder?
Show me were in the ToS over a year ago, where it says you’re not allowed to train an AI on the video.
Rights holder can’t control what people are using the video for. They can control when and how it’s delivered, but not who’s actually watching it.
made out of clips he didn’t have the rights
See, and this is where your showing your ignorance in understanding how currently AI functions.
Yes, it’s possible the AI could go and make shittier videos with its new knowledge. As could the novice plumber in the example I gave.
But the AI isn’t copying clips of any videos.
It’s not a repository of the videos/pictures or words it was exposed to, that it just recalls.
LLMs do not model the world - Sean Carroll
videos they stole
They pirated the videos?
without consent,
Youtubers still got paid for the AI views.
What extra compensation do they think they are due?
Dude learns how to do plumbing from plumbing channels, goes out and makes a business plumbing. I don’t see why the author of said videos are entitled to prevent that or needs to give the plumber permission to do so?
I’m sure I’ll eat the downvotes from this group who’ll shout FUCK AI no matter what the context is, But in this particular case, I don’t see how this is a problem.
Entity watched your video, and then went and did something that made money. It didn’t copy your video, that’s not how AI works. So copyright doesn’t have a leg to stand on.
You created a video garner views to make you money. This thing saw your video, you made your money.
I’ll integrate ChatGPT into my household when I can run it locally on my own server computer.
I’ve moved to fedia.io (mbin)
kbin.social is always down, always spitting our errors/etc.
His worst fear is to end up like Gaddafi.
Truth is… everyone has a price.
Release Date when?
what?