• 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 19th, 2023

help-circle







  • Just insulting people will always make them buck against your points, however valid and informed. Bad approach.

    The problem with radioactive waste isn’t the fact that it’s dangerous now, it’s the fact that it remains dangerous for much longer than we’re even remotely able to plan for. People will likely have to deal with that danger in waaaay longer than civilization has existed on earth so far.

    So the horizontal borehole for instance: amazing idea for the next century - or even, heck, few millenia!! - but how do you make sure our ancestors in 50,000 years never drill a new borehole right there?




  • Je serai très curieux d’entendre l’analyse d’un professionnel avec un PhD en théologie sur l’étrange mouvance américaine qui s’appuie sur la religion pour justifier de supporter un groupe politique dont l’ensemble des valeurs énoncées et démontrées vont à l’encontre de toutes les valeurs morales affirmées comme étant chrétiennes.

    Vois-tu un côté incongru à ce phen, ou au contraire est-il logique à ceux qui étudient la religion? Vois-tu le même phénomène à travers l’europe et à travers le monde?

    Question parallèle : j’aimerai entendre ton opinion sur l’origine de la moralité. Il semble y avoir une croyance comme quoi la moralité et le sense de la responsabilité envers autrui se fonde dans la relation des individus avec le divin, leur propre désir de vivre une vie qui - étant morale - leur garanti une éternité au paradis, etc. D’un autre côté, tous les athées que je connais (moi-même inclus) ont un sens morale rigoureux et un desir d’avoir un impact positif sur notre société, basé sur une vision commune de ce que l’humanité peut devenir. Vois-tu une opportunité de redéfinir la relation entre les groupes religieux et les laïcs/athées? Comment peut on faire évoluer les choses?

    Merci et bonne chance!







  • You might - refusing to sign, sending a well written formal notice, articulating a good demand with a rationale. It could be that based on your skills, the economy, opportunities in your field, etc that their standard severance won’t “make you whole”, i.e. allow you to find replacement employment that pays the same in a reasonable timeframe.

    Ultimately a judge might rule that you had a reasonable expectation of financial stability from your employer, and by laying you off they’re taking that away. The severance is there to bridge that expectation, so if you can demonstrate that their offered severance package is really far, you have a case.

    Now the employer knows that - so if you prepare properly and ask/negotiate you have a shot!


  • Ulvain@sh.itjust.workstoAntiwork@slrpnk.netWhat would you do?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well technically the worst (but absolutely legal) thing you can do, from their perspective is to be very well versed in your rights for the state or province you’re in. Is it a dismissal without cause? Then what severance are they offering? Did your negotiate it? Basically they’ll want you to sign something and promise not to sue - in exchange to signing this they’ll offer something. Negotiate that… Usually in the form of X weeks of pay per years of service at your employer, but X can vary and be negotiated. You can also negotiate a referral letter from your boss even though companies usually say “we don’t make referral letters” - as part of my package negotiation you will…

    I hope it helps!!