This is true on one hand, but on the other hand, the businesses still using Ubuntu 10.04 with its original kernel would like a word.

I still would take an extra mm for more battery life. At this point it’s no difference if it’s a bit thinner.

How does this appeal to people? I like goldfish the same. Though Whales are cheaper and taste okie.

Honestly good on them for keeping the spirit alive for just about everyone who isn’t a direct competitor of theirs.

Let them make some money to continue to fund it. They even invalidated all sponsorships because of the license change.

Unless you personally were willing to fund whatever they make on their integration, then this is an ok play in my book.

I still hope as part of the antitrust ruling, they rip chrome from Google and undo this crap.

I’ve had good luck with uBlock Lite.

(Yes I could swap browsers but nah).

I know this may come off as a surprise: but I imagine that requiring JS in 2024 isn’t a big deal to most people.

Now of course Lemmy skews more into that small crowd.

I don’t blame any website for requiring JS for full functionality in 2024.

What? I have winco down the block… I’ll check for it next time I’m there.

Edit: confirmed not at our WinCo

Thankfully we can federate bot posts to make that easier :P

I live in the USA and can confirm never seeing this before.

Though I’d try it tbh

This reminds me of when a coworker wrote a protocol around sending encrypted messages back and forth inside of gchat to control another PC.

The reason was that: our company firewall doesn’t let stuff go in directly, but we have internet.

I thought that was a nutty tos violation.

Each system had a Google account and would login and listen for messages from the controller.

A Google search later: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/privacy-and-control-over-your-recall-experience-d404f672-7647-41e5-886c-a3c59680af15

All local. Nothing sent. You can choose to not believe it, but it’s deceptive to imply they don’t say it’s local.

If you don’t believe them it’s one thing but they said what they said.

Lots of comments in here saying this sends stuff to Microsoft and yet that isn’t true. It’s an offline local feature.

I personally look forward to giving it a try.

Probably bureaucracy. Also an inability to pivot even when things make no sense. Everything is a giant freight train that has very little ability to change direction or stop.

Oh and of course a healthy taste of not being transparent or honest.

Source: I used to work there years ago.

‘in the 10s’

… man I feel old now lol.

That you have multiple fish tanks and a shrimp tank.

It’s exciting, but man there are lots of assumptions in native python built around the gil.

I’ve seen lists, etc. modified by threads assuming the gil locks for them. Testing this e2e for any production deployment can be a bit of a nightmare.

Remember how Google’s Find My Network was supposed to be as good or better than Apple’s. We put a tracker in a checked bag. Couldn’t track it from once we lost sight till when it was 10 feet from me.

It’s a bit odd, but isn’t it equivalent to forking and putting up a fork elsewhere?

I guess I don’t see the problem.

In theory this could be beaten by using a link to a timestamp at 1 second in. If it starts at 0, it’s an ad.

I pay for premium… but also like my sponsorblock… and 3rd party clients. Let me have it all momma Google.