Absolutely loving this comment-chain.

Once you face the (seemingly) inevitable necessity of further hardware purchases it does become sort of tedious I must say. I used to treat my raid parity as a “backup” for way longer than I’d like to admit because I didn’t want my costs to double. With unraid I at least don’t have the same management workload that I have on my main box where I have a rolling release Arch with manually installed ZFS where the build always has to line up with the kernel version and all that jazz. Unraid is my deploy and forget box. Rsync every 24h. God bless.

Proxmox has been recommended to me before I switched my main server to Arch but once I realised that it has no direct docker support I thought I’d rather just do things myself. It really is a matter of preference. It’s kind of hard to believe that all the functionality in Proxmox can be had for absolutely free.

It’s understandable that you want to take your virtualization-capabilities to the next level but I also don’t see the appeal of containerizing unraid like many others here. I started using unraid last autumn and to me it really is about being able to mix drive sizes. It’s a backup to my main server’s ZFS pool so (fingers crossed) I don’t even really worry about drive failures on unraid. (I have double parity on ZFS and single parity on unraid.)

Anyways my point is I started out with 8 SATA slots plus an old USB-based enclosure with i set to JBOD mode and that was a pretty stupid idea. unraid couldn’t read SMART data from those USB drives. Every once in a while one of the drives would suddenly show up as having an unsupported partition layout. Couple weeks ago all 5 drives in the enclosure started showing up as unusable. So as you can imagine I dropped that enclosure and now am working solely off the 8 internal slots. I’d imagine that virtualizing unraid’s disk access might potentially yield similar issues. At least the comments of people here remind me of my own janky setup.

It’s quite the classic how it is so often assumed that one holding a discussion on the internet (not just about American politics) in English must be American. But I’m sure even knowing that I’m not it won’t take you long to come up with a readymade label for me like you do and put on display somewhat overbearingly. Trust me I’ve been to the ol’ Reddit rodeo before it bit the moral dust and I’ve been so to the tune of over a decade. Not trying to flex I’m just saying whatever it is you’re trying to accomplish (and I’m not assuming bad faith at all here) it’s not worth what you’re willingly forfeiting in terms of potential connection with other people. I’ve been that guy you’re currently choosing to be. I’ve lived inside that quote-by-quote-rebuttal brain.

You’ve arranged your space of neat little drawers and boxes of attributes and analytics so you can have the “correct” opinion on virtually anything at a moment’s notice. Let me be the guy to tell you that all you’re doing is playing yourself, cheating yourself out of god knows what it is that you truly seek. You think the reason no one is meeting you on par in your place is because next to none possess equivalent clarity when looking upon the world and its affairs. The reality is that most people - regardless of eloquence or level of reason - just aren’t going to have that conversation because it’s not worth what’s given up in the process. As humans we strive for connection with our peers. But no one ever said that it’s a contest of whoever has the least peers in verbal exchange gets a master debater placque on top.

If you want to see entire groups of people as beneath you or label them domestic terrorists or what have you, of course no one’s gonna be able to stop you. But maybe also apply at least some amount of self-reflection here and there along the way. Through countless points made you don’t have but one solution in store. All you have are subjective conclusions to say that X is bad and Y + Z are to blame. And if Y or Z try to have a conversation about it then they are surely just as bad as X, which they caused of course. I unsarcastically hope that people of your intelligence find the right channels to focus their energies on.

You’re right that is not a good compass on what to do. My personal opinion on why there should be a debate either way is because without conversation humanity is just lost in general. A conversation with Trump may not ever be something worth having content-wise but in the arena of politics I’d say it’s sort of a baseline. When we dehumanize him and his base (as in they’re not worth talking to) like he dehumanizes everyone that doesn’t dream of sucking on his fascist tiddies then we’re really no better in that regard.

Biden couple days before his SOTU said “let’s get the border bill passed together” towards Trump and that’s what this country needs badly. Literally turning the other cheek. No one except Trump is to blame for the collective mental disorder his sycophants are suffering. He is a cancer which unfortunately cannot (yet) be cut out of the system it leeches from so this needs to be accepted as reality and dealt with accordingly. There is no winning with cancer but when treated correctly it can be “beaten”. His brain won’t be in good shape come November. Something’s got to give eventually. His body. His indictments. His fines. Man probably has less net money in the bank than your average Joe rn but he won’t give up his grip on the (thanks to him) neofascist republican party so easily.

The problem is if Biden doesn’t debate Trump Trump can use that on the campaign trail. Probably a lot more usefully than if he didn’t have that argument of “Sleepy Joe’s too scared”. They’re both old af. In their heads probably neither of them wants an open debate.

What we need is 2024 SOTU Biden mopping the floor with him but who knows how likely that is.

Must be why he’s not on the ballot and imprisoned instead.

I recently “upgraded” one of my raspberrys SD cards to an industrial grade one. Seems to me like those are a lot slower but for that particular use case it doesnt matter to me. What matters is that the card doesn’t die. It runs noticeably cooler when lots of data is being written to it so I feel like I must be onto something there.

I used to (over a span of about 4 years now) just rely on a RaidZ2 (ZFS) pool (faulted drive replacements never gave any issues) but I recently did an expansion of the array plus OS reinstall and only now am I starting to incorporate Docker containers into my workflows. The live data is in ~ and nightly rsynced onto the new larger RaidZ2 pool but there is also data on that pool which I’ve thus far never stored anywhere else.

So my answer to the question would be an off-site unraid install which is still in the works. This really will only be that. A catastophe insurance. I probably won’t even rely on parity drives there in order to maximize space since I already have double parity on ZFS.

As far as reinstallation goes, I don’t feel like restoring ~ and running docker compose for all the services again would be too much of a hassle.