Why not Lego person instead of Lego man?
Why not Lego person instead of Lego man?
Where does the judge say that? He orders him to report to jail, though, which might.
Saying “that boy pussy” might not be about another person, so I’m also not sure this should actually be offensive. He might just be thinking about anal sex while he is in a vagina.
I’m making a big assumption though:
I think the game is supposed to feel difficult
For the story to make sense, I’m guessing that the person you’re responding to meant OG Oculus or OG Rift as in the development kit.
Here’s an opinion of somebody unwilling to reflect or learn.
Oh god. I know people that do this already and call it “target practice”.
The punishment section of the Hebrew version suggests many interpretations where words are euphemisms for things related to abortions. Her thigh might refer to her sexual organs, the curse an abortificent, etc. I think those meanings still exist in other translations.
Now I think you’re a loser because you’ve lost the thread and misinterpreted what I said to mean you’re losing.
I am not a theist and I see that you’re just not paying attention to what you’re responding to. Almost like Christians to preach while closing your eyes and ears.
I think you’ve lost the thread. They are explaining why you are privileged not to have to lie by giving examples of situations that would compel many people to lie.
Would you say that you’ve been in any of those situations?
It is correct, though. They are writing from an international perspective, away from our little party games, so we are being lumped together.
If you don’t like it, all it takes is changing general public sentiment enough to change elections in your favor and doing it enough for them to notice.
Am I to believe that she has extremely rigid hair or that there is no airflow around her head in in front of an open door in a helicopter?
Exactly my point
Did they say how? Peace would be preferred, but the Taiwanese need to be willing to cooperate.
Power affects people in different ways
Freedom of speech only restricts the government, not private institutions or individuals. We might value it and protect it to some degree privately, but those parties are not restricted the same way the government is.
Others with bad decision making or reasoning skills has no consequence?
I agree with you, but I want to point out that this conflation is a direct result of our election system because it mechanically cannot support more than two parties.
Any other political interests need to merge together into one big entity that is nearly impossible to disentangle from the rest, so now maga = conservatism and we lose a lot of nuance in or political decision making and ability to be represented.
I’m pushing for Election Reform this election to move past First Past the Post voting.