The brain-dead take is that companies should explore new technology. Without any qualifiers on it (i assume there aren’t because you didn’t add any and you applied it to ai). That’s how we’ve ended up with such a huge amount of waste, pollution and theft from small independents.

Even if we just narrow it to the field of AI, the waste and environmental damage from just this kind of tech is just absurd.

Let’s add to the downsizing ai causes, the pathetic service disruptions and inevitable decline of a company’s reputation from using such a thing and its nothing but a waste.

Nor should what they produce be copyrightable in any form. Even if it’s the base upon which an artist builds.

Also, it should all be free.

Funny thing is, that the part of the brain used for talking makes things up on the fly as well 😁 there is great video from Joe about this topic, where he shows experiments done to people where the two brain sides were split.

Having watched the video. I can confidently say you’re wrong about this and so is Joe. If you want an explanation though let me know.

Or, the words “i don’t know” would work

That hasn’t been the case if you look into what happened with Microsoft and browsers.

The other thing is

everyone would still use Google.

Is actually wrong, and what they proved with the antitrust case itself. A huge chunk of the anticompetitive activity was Google paying to be the default because people don’t change the default.

That’s not in anyone’s interest. It’s the surest way to have a thousand national search engines which are all shitty. National walled internet Gardens etc

Break it up instead

We are all travelling through time right now with very little impact.

Yes I know, I suck.