• 0 Posts
  • 164 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • It’s about the big, long-term picture. Companies spend money on branding and advertising because it works. You create the perception that your product is for a certain type of person, which makes them more inclined to buy it. By making cigarettes boring, you make them less appealing, and on average less people will smoke.

    Fine, but if that the point, a more honest (intellectually) thing to do would be simply ban cigarettes advertising. The way it is done seems to me something like “I want to ban this but I don’t want to be the one that do it”.


  • Tobacco companies fought it tooth and nail. Kept arguing it wouldn’t stop people from smoking.

    They are right, people will not stop smoking only because the packaging is dull.

    Well then why are you lobbying so hard against it? Obviously the only reason they will ever fight anything is because they think it will hurt their revenue. So whatever they oppose, I support.

    Because they lost advertising opportunity.
    People recognize the brand by the packaging before even reading the brand name. This way your country just make any type of advertising for the cigarettes useless. And maybe as a collateral effect some younger people will not start to smoke since they will not see the advertising, but as far as I know people don’t start to smoke because the package is cool.


  • The fact is these are high tech machines. To follow your example with the car, you don’t need to replace the battery but an ECU, for which there are no available design and you have no idea how to build it.
    Add to this that probably if you make a mistake in your try, you destroy the machine.

    Basically what ASLM is saying is that they can brick the machine with a software update and even if not bricked the machine cannot run long without specialized maintenance and spare parts (that they obviously will not provide anymore). True, China can try to clone them, but even if/when understand how to make them, you then need to make them, a thing which seems out of question for now for China (else they already would have such machines).
















  • Not that I want to defend Musk, but

    The whole carbon credits thing

    I suppose here he just used something that was present, like many other entities

    Other companies have largely eaten their lunch, launching solid EV’s that rival or better Tesla

    Yes, only after Tesla show that it is possible to make a nice EV car. Do you remember all the EV cars before Tesla.

    Their reputation was built off of the end-goal of mass-producing affordable EV’s, something they will now not do.

    Given they started from scratch, I’d say the are not that bad



  • gian @lemmy.grys.ittoTechnology@lemmy.worldCory Doctorow gets scammed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wait, I was talking about the fact that most EU bank (if not all) need to have a two factor authentication system in place, which limit a lot what a scammer can do.
    In this case I think that a scam like this would not be possible or at least it would be stopped in the moment the bank app would ask to confirm what I am supposedly doing.

    A national digital ID system is nice (in Italy we have the SPID), but it does not limit anything if you really can do everything with just the credid card number.