same, i also abuse free trials pretty hard.
(virtual credit cards and visa gift cards with little to no money on them work great)
same, i also abuse free trials pretty hard.
(virtual credit cards and visa gift cards with little to no money on them work great)
they aren’t.
but when the IDF does it it’s a feature?
it’s a genocide; that’s the point.
Nobody comes out of this clean.
it’s a genocide; it’s not rational.
jesus christ you should be shoved into a locker
hmm, this is sort of helpful.
this is pretty much what i think, yeah.
a lot of programming/software design is already kinda that anyway. it’s a bunch of people who were educated on computer science principles, data structures, mathematicians, and data analytics/stats who write code to specs to solve very specific tool problems for very specific subsets of workers, and who maintain/update legacy code written decades ago.
now, yeah, a lot things are coded from scratch, but even then, you’re referencing libraries of code written by someone awhile ago to solve this problem or serve this purpose or do thing, output thing. that’s where LLMs shine, imo.
i didn’t downvote you, regardless internet points don’t matter.
you’re not wrong, and i largely agree with what you’ve said, because i didn’t actually say a lot of the things your comment assumes.
the most efficient way i can describe what i mean is this:
LLMs (this is NOT AI) can, and will, replace more and more of us. however, there will never, ever be a time where there will be no human overseeing it because we design software for humans (generally), not for machines. this requires integral human knowledge, assumptions, intuition, etc.
exactly, this will eliminate some jobs, but anyone who’s asked an LLM to fix code longer than 400 lines knows it often hurts more than it helps.
which is why it is best used as a tool to debug code, or write boilerplate functions.
this rules, thank you!!
would a factory reset destroy any driver/codec updates, or are those a firmware based changes that wouldn’t be overwritten?
i hate microtransactions, but as they go, this implementation is fairly benign.
personally think it’s less a problem with age. age limits are arbitrary and likely have no basis in science (within reason). however i do think it could be advantageous to require a variety of ages of people, and somehow weight their input, but that process may destroy the inherent value of a representative democracy; if we let everyone speak nothing will get done.
personally i think hard term limits and ranked choice voting would fix the majority of issues caused by generational gaps.
on this episode of “My Sincerely Held Belief Takes Precedence Over Everything” we once again attempt to claim that any consequences for my anti-social behavior is a direct attack on myself and my religion.
i am sure it will be “too expensive” for the next 30 to 40 years.