![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Buy an EV ything? In this economy?
Buy an EV ything? In this economy?
Yes, there is/was a setting for that, should be on by default.
Oh they know, Azure is running on Linux
Hey, I’ve seen this stuff before!
It was in the book Foundation by Asimov!
What did it say this means?
They ate so many faces as of today, what are you talking about? Microsoft has a long history of doing this, I can’t believe you can in any way defend them.
So were many other things in the past.
I hate that people keep saying this shit.
‘But the article said…’ yes, the face eating leopards said there were not going to eat your face today.
See you next week.
I believe it was this one link
There is a bigger one, with more networking terms, but I can’t find it right now :|
Crypto fellaz always forget that we actually have this solution in most databases, and it’s called write-ahead-log.
There is - Firefox
The entire internet is built on open-source technologies, as you probably know. That doesn’t make the internet as a whole an open-source thing. Transport technologies are open, a lot of hardware and software around it is not, and that’s still talking about the infrastructure, not what is actually running on top of all that.
It’s like saying Windows is open-source because they use curl. And Microsoft is as open to open-source code as long as they can train their LLM on it and sell it to you. Sure they provide money and developers to some projects, but Windows, Office, Azure will most likely never be actually open to code investigations, forget free.
OS X refers to those parts of the distribution which aren’t open-source
From your own quote
It’s not like most of the population can fit inside a generic hatchback…
I get that bigger cars make sense for some people, but definitely not majority.
It’s not a gift TO the oil companies, but FROM them.
“I was really struggling with the technical aspects of how to define what a deepfake was,” he said.
yeah, just a quick grammar check, nothing else
Physical things are much easier to regulate than software, much less serverless.
We already regulate certain images, and it matters very little.
The bigger payoff will be from educating the public and accepting that we can’t win every war.
I hear you, and I don’t necessarily disagree with you, I just know that’s not how anything works.
Regulations work for big companies, but there isn’t a big company behind this specific case. And those small-time users have run away and you can’t stop them.
It’s like trying to regulate cameras to not store specific images. Like, I get the sentiment, but sorry, no. It’s not that I would not like that, it’s just not possible.
While I agree with your attitude, the whole ‘laissez-fair’ thing is probably a misunderstanding:
There is nothing we can do to stop the AI.
Nothing.
The genie is out of the bottle, the Pandora’s box has been opened, everything is out and it won’t ever return. The world will never be the same, and it’s irrelevant what people think.
That’s why we need to better understand the post-AI world we created, and figure out what do to now.
Also, to hell with CP. (feels weird to use the word ‘fuck’ here)
Please remind me how long it takes to build new nuclear plants?
So stream your desktop to the VM?