![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
So trying to hack hackthebox is not permitted? Confusion is the name of the game
So trying to hack hackthebox is not permitted? Confusion is the name of the game
Unofficial documentation using OpenAPI is here @egeres@lemmy.world .
Btw, the user interface uses the same API. Just open the web developer tools in your browser and look at the network tab.
It seems to be built on the same components as VScode and VScodium. Honestly, I don’t see the point… yeah, sure, they want their editor to work on the web, but couldn’t they have don’t that with a GUI lib that compiles to WASM?
It feels like it’s only for open source purists aka a minority.
It’s the most wanted feature.
I think if people really want it, they can pool together on a bounty.
Who the hell came up with that? 😂 I’m sorry, but that’s hilarious.
Sometimes I’m in awe at the effort people put into these memes. Well done 😄
P.S Now make one about people who squash 100 commits into one without cleaning up the message and have a single commit with 1k added / 2k removed in it for the sake of “clean” history.
Code is the most in depth spec one can provide. Maybe someday we’ll be able to iterate just by verbally communicating and saying “no like this”, but it doesn’t seem like we’re quite there yet. But also, will that be productive?
Doesn’t seem like it’s open source. Am I mistaken?
You don’t believe that income (or lack thereof) can motivate the sale of a popular library to a shady party?
Any threat actor group with sufficient funds from various campaigns, spyware, etc could use said funds to buy out a dev, owner, etc.
I don’t see VLC being bought out.
This is the perfect example of distracting from the fact of what happened.
If you say so… this isn’t the first time an underpaid opensource dev sold their project only for it to end up being used for ads or malware.
Opensource devs need to get paid a living wage 😩 This stuff keeps happening and somehow, I can’t completely blame the devs. Thousands of sites use the product and barely anybody donates. It’s not sustainable.
Ah yes, the almighty counter “everything is relative”. “Malbolge is a fine language with its strengths and weaknesses. It has perfectly valid usecases and can never be shit on, ever.”
Anything is better than C, right? Even 🤮 PHP.
That’s cool and all, but how will they make money?
I honestly thought C++ (aka dumping ground of programming concepts) would implement this for “completeness”.
There is no way to completely protect ourselves from cyber attacks, but at least we can avoid software with an “opinion.”
Well… everybody has an opinion. It’s inevitable as thinking beings. The difference is whether people are willing to act upon it.
There are many projects with a Code Of Conduct out there that could be interpreted as very left leaning. There are projects with the express purpose of fighting subjugation or helping journalists’ ability to report on political topics. Signal is an example of such a project. Are those projects to be avoided too?
X? As in X11? Or X as in previously twitter? For the former, wayland exists and for the latter, the fediverse exists. Both, I wouldn’t consider a security threat.
Oh sweet! And it was released 2 days ago! Wow, some people move quickly.
Is that version important somehow?
This is why when I read about “new browsers” being developed, I kind of shrug a little. Yes, browser standards are dominated by Google and it’s shit, but instead of just playing in Google’s stump of a playground, why not try and do something new and innovative like what Alan Kay is describing? Pipe a program or a script or web assembly or something else to another computer and let it render it. Or hell, come up with something different.
If everybody just tries to play Google’s game where Google makes the rules, they’re going to lose. The game is rigged. Create a new one.
Anti Commercial-AI license