![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/1457718c-43b7-41df-b443-85747c9c5396.jpeg)
And importantly, it shows that you are not phased by the discomfort you are inflicting on others
And importantly, it shows that you are not phased by the discomfort you are inflicting on others
Time to include this in the DSM
Edit: apparently the paper is more than a year old. And here is the doi to the original paper:
https://doi.org/10.5114%2FCIPP%2F162006
Too late sad trumpet 🎺
Thanks, that was a good read. It is terrible that some researchers end up committing such scientific fraud. Although I am inclined to blame the involved researchers themselves, ultimately, I believe that inflexible (and insufficient) funding is the real culprit
Wow, on the islands I know, humans outnumber the number of shrines
I’m surprised. As I understand it, the Alzheimer’s field is starting to recognize that the plaques are likely a result of, rather than a cause of, the disease. And that the cause may be more related to a, potentially microglia related, inflammatory problem in the CNS
It should be yes. The doi is stable though
Original article:
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl2688
Check out this comprehensive review from 2022 about vaping and health:
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-065997
The last bit in its conclusion section states:
“The true impact of vaping on respiratory health will manifest over the coming decades, but in the interval a prudent and time tested recommendation remains to abstain from consumption of inhaled nicotine and other products.”
Not necessarily. For instance, YouTube uses the old ad model and is of course not creator owned.
Additionally, you can use patreon while also using (and capitalising on) your own content distribution systems.
This is all to say, I do think the ad model may stay somewhat relevant, however, I also think that other income avenues are helpful and enable content creators more flexibility in terms of the manner in which they think they can best reach their audiences while generating income
I think it is worth mentioning that patreon also surfaced as a means to provide income for creators. Whether this was a direct result of ad blockers may be debatable. However, patreon certainly provides creators with an avenue to generate income that is not dependent on ads services.
Then there are also creator focused platforms like nebula and curiosity stream, which aim to provide creators with a fair share of generated revenue.
All in all, my take on the developments over the past ten years or so is that ad revenue sharing (with creators) provided an important impulse to establish the field of online content creation, and that shortcomings of this model are now being addressed. Mainly to funnel more money to the content creators rather than platform owners.
Thanks Todd
This text-based game is fun:
https://pmotschmann.github.io/Evolve/
If your problems are similar to this video, it doesn’t bode well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMBOJcF2JLc
No
The gene therapy is applied locally. They operate on the ear to enable access to the relevant tissue and then apply the therapy. So it should only affect cells in the ear.
Additionally, it is unclear to me whether the therapeutic gene is integrated into the genome. It might not be.
For transmission to offspring, you would need to edit germ line cells (sex cells) and you would need to integrate the gene into the genome.
Great achievement. Not much on the tech though. According to the ucam press release, they used an AAV1 viral delivery system. Given that the therapy is permanent, I would expect integration of the therapeutic gene into the patient’s genome (in the targeted tissue). Anyone have more on this?
https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/baby-born-deaf-can-hear-after-breakthrough-gene-therapy
Edit: I think this patent may be relevant
https://www.patentsencyclopedia.com/app/20130095071
HA!