• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No one likes a raunchy coochie/schlong

        Untrue. There are some people that specifically seek that, along with the STDs called “bug chasers.” Since I’ve been cursed with this knowledge, so must you all be.

      • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly, I think condoms are unrealistic. Fucking with a condom is so totally useless that you almost feel a bit resentful of the woman after. Like she has bad minge or something. The first time I had sex I was a good boy and used a condom and I just quit after a while, and sat down and wondered what the fuck was wrong. She thought I’d finished.

        Saying “wear a rubber” is stupid. For a lot of people, sex with a condom is completely useless. I’ll wear one the first time with a woman as I ofc want to get imtimate, but the sex itself will be useless.

        • frankspurplewings@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you aren’t creative enough to get off, then sex with you is probably useless too. 🤷🏼‍♀️

          But lame ass roasting aside, being responsible during sex is important. Being able to communicate your wants and needs is absolutely necessary. I’ll tell you that I also hated condoms during sex, but it took being with my partner about six months before I felt comfortable enough to bring up a discussion about having sex without condoms. We then talked about the risks of accidental pregnancy, STDs, and my hormones and birth control. In the long term, the time period we used condoms was worth it because we learned each other’s bodies, as well as each other’s personalities. Once we did move to sex without condoms, it was sooooo much better, but we also were better communicators and the sex was wayyy more fun.

          You have to be willing to put in the time and effort and trust that leads to a real connection first.

          • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            If you aren’t creative enough to get off, then sex with you is probably useless too. 🤷🏼‍♀️

            But lame ass roasting aside

            Not gonna pretend that I don’t deserve it, or that I’m very polite either, but beginning every response with an insult is not some clever ‘roasting’.

            I don’t agree with you that it should take half a year of learning your partner for sex to be good. If you’re attentive and interested in getting your partner off, then you can do that the first time, or certainly atleast in a shorter time than that. But it’s going to differ between different people ofc.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh, I’m way ahead of them there, with 44 years of shitty diet and lifestyle choices.

  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    the first trials for this resulted in men becoming sterile and then killing themselves.

    And then a bunch of female comedians made fun of them for “being a little moody”

    • triclops6@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Did this happen? Or was this a satirical take on something that happened to women?

    • Hackworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Women’s birth control hasn’t exactly been side-effect-free, what with the strokes. But also, sauce?

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The point of the joke is not that they think men are being babies about it. It is that women’s birth control causes these same side effects, along with strokes, and a number of other serious, long term issues. However when women say they do not want to take birth control, and instead opt for doing things that requirement more responsibility of the man, they are often told similar things concerning the negative effects they get when using it, and they should just deal with it.

        • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That is actually not true. Not downplaying the significance of these affects, but…

          In the 60s and 70s a large number of planned parenthood clinics were in low-income and predominantly black neighbourhoods, aimed at reducing the number of black babies.

          In the same era birth control (more appropriately termed eugenics) programs forcibly sterilized black and indigenous women. Where it was presented as an option, the consequence for not following through on these doctor’s “recommendations,” were threats to withhold healthcare or public assistance. The statistics through the 60s and 70s were that roughly 1 in 4 were non-consenually sterilized.

          But also, yeah, the results of this trial are fucked and people are right to be skeptical of this drug.

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe not, but female hormonal birth control can cause liver tumors and blood clots. Can’t have more kids if a blood clot kills you.

          The moral of the story should be safer contraceptives for everyone…

          Unfortunately for women they weigh the side effects of hormonal birth control against those of a pregnancy. Since pregnancy also increases the chance of blood clots and other things they just say “good enough!” And put it on the market…which is bullshit. Either way we’re at higher risk of serious health issues.

          That’s why women are angry. I feel confident saying the majority of women dont want unsafe bc for men. We want more research into safer bc options available for us too.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Male self control breakthrough keeps their dick in their pants and don’t have sex for a while. Try it some time, it’s fantastic.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I tried it, but when I’m around your mom, she keeps begging for it!

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They aren’t an alternative.

      From the website you linked’s own FAQ

      While a sleeve is non-porous and should not allow fluids to escape they have not been tested nor are they recommended to be a form of contraception.

      Yes a condom can be worn under a sleeve. Wearing one over a sleeve will not help if you are wearing it as a form of contraception.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Especially if it’s true. Which if they haven’t tested them, an easily probably thing to prove for them, then they should not be recommended by you, or anyone, as a contraceptive.

          It’s like my ex trying to tell her birthcontrol is working just fine because she took 3 pills at once after forgetting to take it twice in a row even though the manufacturer says if you dont follow the directions you have to start the initial waiting period over again, because “i think they have to say that” (she also used those exact words)

          Bad advice is bad advice. Why should anyone ever trust their future and also their health by listening to your advice that directly opposes the manufacturers warning. They are legally liable for their product, you are just some random person potentially ruining peoples lives with your opinions.

          I hope they sue you for damages before anyone fucks up their life by being convinced by your bad attitude

          • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I mean, cotton swab manufacturers have to include an instruction not to clean your ears with their product, but let’s be real: that’s what they’re for.

            • Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              And any audiologist or ENT will back them up and also tell you not to do that and then give you examples of known reasons why they also say dont use them

                • Jarix@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  How is that in anyway relevant to this discussion about them as a contraceptive device???!?

                  You might as well be talking about the pull put method of contraceptive with a line like that, which is not helpful

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Safe, cheap, permanent but trivially reversible male birth control was invented in 1979 and has yet to be approved for US sale.

  • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Finally! Finally they’re trying to take the bullets out of the gun instead of trying to make a stronger bulletproof vest. I feel cautiously optimistic!

    I’m a bit jealous that there’s no side effects, though. Depo made me gain 30lbs in ONE month. I’m lucky it made my tits significantly bigger (Went from a B to a DD), but that was not a fun experience.

  • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I will never ever trust this. Not with how gender/maleness is treated these days. What ‘they’ consider safe can be entirely political and ideology-based, rather than a biological fact.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      statistically, you’ll probably die in a car crash but the news doesnt even report auto accidents anymore.

    • Luccus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Who’s “they”?

      If it’s Urologists, like, those are the experts. If it’s someone on Twitter, they don’t matter. If it’s women as a whole… oh, boy. Dude. If it’s “the jews”, OH. BOY. DUDE. HOW EVEN?

      • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not jews, it’s not women, and it’s not strictly urologists. It’s everyone in government and the medical field who can influence what is and isn’t considered OK.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    When it comes to birth control for far too long women have been getting the short end of the…… oh, nevermind