Different countries have different distributions, click “change”. Canada, Australia, New Zealand have similar to the US. France, Germany, UK peak 40-44.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    Almost 20 years of schooling, crushing amounts of debt, no respect from elders, and shit income. Sounds about right.

  • the_q@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    Forcing adulthood on a precooked brain does that. Couple that with a bleak future, low income, constant influence from every direction… Yeah it makes sense.

    • flicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I know, right? Anybody in here who is a statistic will tell you why that number goes down over time.

  • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Could there be a sample bias? I’m willing to bet that young people are more accepting of receiving therapy, and thus more likely to get diagnosed?

    Edit: the info says “whether or not they’ve been diagnosed”. Looks like they took it into account. Damn scientists being smarter than me!

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    That’s really interesting, thanks for the link.

    Looking at the UK, there’s an interesting pattern between 2010 and 2019 - the 40-44 group is one of the lowest and is that the bottom of a dip. But by 2019, that same age group is the one with the highest rate, and is at the top of a hill.

    I wonder why? What caused that age group and those around it to reverse their order?

    You can also see that shift here:

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s different people in that group 9 years later? 40-44 in 2019 was 30-34 in 2010. In 2010 the 30-34 group was the second highest. Maybe they carry that spike with them over time.

      • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, maybe.Although, that carry forward effect doesn’t seem to apply elsewhere, or else we’d see the same “hill-valley-hill” pattern shifted up a couple of age groups.

        The numbers are probably too small for it to have any real significance, but it’s interesting anyway :-)

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You 18: every adult I know is a failure. All they want out of life is a career, a home, a partner, and kids. Don’t they know you just get this stuff by default?

    You 24: well fuck me

    You 30: the amount of stuff in my life that is currently on fire is pretty low. So today is a good day.

    Edit: a word

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I gotta say, that’s a great interactive graph. Not only does it allow you to change regions, you can easily change from a single year to multi-year timespan graph to see how it changes over time.

    I just wish the timespan graph would display the values still ordered by age. Because I was wondering if would shift with the/a generation getting older or not.

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because on everyone else’s chart it gets better with age, in Germany it looks like you’re just fucked for life.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Only because it scales relative to the maximum value, it looks worse at a glance when it’s actually notably better.

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            The maximum value is the population, as a percent of society it doesn’t get better.

      • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If I were* a kraut

        When using be in an if clause for an unreal conditional sentence, always conjugate it as were, no matter what the subject is. Even if the subject is first-person singular (I) or third-person singular (he, she, or it), still use were with an if clause in unreal conditional sentences.