• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wasn’t like… a huge deal made about how the Teslas are so waterproof they could double as a boat? I mean they can in fact ford much deeper than ICE cars because they don’t need air, but also there’s definitely tweets about this.

    Edit: he said it about both the cybertruck - loads of stories about this - and the model S: https://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/a21421/elon-musk-model-s-boat/

    This is entirely separate of course from the much more basic issue that a car that breaks because of some fucking precipitation is not fit for purpose and this damage report would be indefensible just about anywhere in the world. Precedent for manufacturers taking responsibility for bad products was first established in Britain centuries ago.

    • Krotiuz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And not to mention it was water ingress into the bloody batteries, they’re lucky (or maybe unlucky in this case) that the car didn’t burn down from the Lithium…

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah… that’s the one part you need to waterproof, more even than the passenger cabin. Everything else except the ECU is water-agnostic. Those battery cells will discharge and die if you leave them submerged. The pack itself is fine for short spells under water if it is properly made.

    • sugartits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is entirely separate of course from the much more basic issue that a car that breaks because of some fucking precipitation is not fit for purpose and this damage report would be indefensible just about anywhere in the world.

      Two things here…

      The source of this is …The Mirror. Not exactly top shelf journalism. They thrive of outage, just like the Daily Fail. Keep that in mind when reading these trash sources.

      I suspect the owner of the vehicle did a lot more than “drive it in a bit of rain” and is simply lying about it in order to try and get bailed out. Funnily enough I’ve not seen a queue of Tesla’s broken down every time I drive in the rain.

      It’s certainly possible that the owner is telling the truth. But I doubt it. I doubt it a lot.

      • sizzler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve recovered Teslas that have “failed” in the rain. It means a moisture sensor has triggered. The car tells you they it can get to where you need to go but then will need to be serviced. It’s a “first” generation problem rather than anything inherently wrong with electric cars.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It means a moisture sensor has triggered.

          Moisture sensors don’t typically cost $21k. They said the batteries were full of water.

          • sizzler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            They said the batteries were full of water

            I think we can assume the moisture sensor was triggered then.

          • Heggico@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is the part I don’t really understand. Aren’t these batteries pretty much all watercooled? Maybe the control electronics got wet causing it to keep the battery on in a flooded condition and thus draining them completely? Maybe just the moisture senser tripped, causing them to say, yeah, water damage, gotta replace it?

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is the statement by the Tesla rep that bad weather was the cause. Now we don’t have any confirmation they said that, but it would take nothing for Tesla to categorically deny that that is an acceptable reason to deny warranty, and state that any rep saying that was at fault. There. Done. Non-story.

        If they can’t categorically deny that then that implies they actually are employing this excuse for their shoddy workmanship. It certainly wouldn’t be the scummiest thing the company has done.

        • steakmeout@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What statement? What you read was not a statement but hearsay in the form of a vaguely retold exchange.

          Fuck Elon and Tesla but this isn’t much to go on.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They got a statement from Tesla who said they were “investigating”. You don’t need to investigate to know that this is a bullshit reason to give, and their silence on that issue speaks volumes. Now, if the statements by the customers were not given to the Tesla rep to respond to, they would have ample opportunity to put out a statement explaining the problems with the article. Have they done that, or is it just silence? Any media rep worth their salt is absolutely going to be aware of this article.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unless a tree fell on the car it shouldn’t stop running because of some wind & rain. This is basic stuff, I don’t know why people don’t get this.

            • Pipoca@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Rain kills cars literally all the time when idiots drive them through flooded roads.

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Some wind and rain”. The Edinburgh and Cannonmill area, where this story is from, has had at least two floods this month severe enough to submerge parked vehicles.

            • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Have you not heard of flooding?

              This is basic stuff, I don’t know why people don’t get this.

              Perhaps it’s the other way around?

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know someone who had to get their Tesla repaired after driving in a puddle. I don’t know the size or depth of the puddle though.

    • evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Elon tweeted something about the cyber truck being water proof enough to be used as a boat once, I don’t know if anything was said about the rest of their cars.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      All BEVs will have similar problems. The battery pack is huge and cannot come into contact with water.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        The battery pack is supposed to be watertight because that is an expected hazard for an outdoor vehicle. It absolutely can come in contact with water, which apart from some minor corrosion and discharge over time due to electrolysis, should not in the short term damage it. The ability to ford shallow rivers is absolutely normal in most BEVs.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is that it just slung underneath the car, exposed to whatever is beneath the car. You can try making it watertight, but water will eventually get it in wetter climates. That will be the problem of all BEVs with giant batteries.

          • nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not “just slung”… The battery fulfills multiple functions as it is part of the chassis. And nobody is “trying” to make it watertight, it is literally engineered that way. We have made things weatersealed since forever, hell even cars just standing outside in wet cold climates won’t get wet inside even after decades. Yet we can’t make a rigid part of a chassis watertight? You’re grasping at straws brother. You have to crash before water gets in.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Grind Hard Plumbing did an offroad Tesla mod where their BEV expert suggested part of the problem was waterproofing everything completely, rather than allowing drain holes in the bottom. Tesla seems to think absolutely sealed batteries are the solution, but water will get in like you say, then it’s trapped.

            They had an issue with the motherboard grtting water damaged for the same reason. As long as the car is right-way-up, drain holes won’t allow much water in during immersion, but they will let it back out.

  • gjoel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    An AI tool was used to add an extra layer to the editing process for this story.

    For crying out loud, stop that!

  • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Okay so for starters this article is clearly just a dig at Elon. If it wasn’t they would never have mentioned him but Elon makes headlines.

    Second, I don’t buy it. We’re getting one side of the story here. They’ve been selling these cars by the millions for years at this point. If the cars were failing “while driving in the rain”, it would be a much bigger deal.

    The " Elon Musk could buy everyone in the world a Tesla if he wanted to." line makes it clear that this is just more Elon/Tesla clickbait.

  • deafboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon Musk could buy everyone in the world a Tesla if he wanted to.

    Well, that would be $ 314 562 157 350 000. in other words, 3 times the global yearly GDP. But one can hardly expect a common sense from a tesla owner :D /s

        • Neon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tesla probably has a lot higher profit than other cars, since Teslas are a Status-Symbol rather than just a Car

          but yes

          • Sowhatever@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Where in the world is Tesla a status symbol? Because I bought my M3P because I couldn’t afford a BMW i4 M50, let alone a iX or EQS/EQE AMG. The BMW is similar size and performance and costs 30% more.

            I still like it, but it was the compromise option.

              • Sowhatever@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not in the EU for sure. American cars have always been “lots of horsepower and low-ish quality for a low price”, and Tesla keeps the trend.

                • GreenM@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I only know rich people who buy Tesla in EU. Rest of the people are driving half the price combustion engine cars.

      • Webster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if the cost was an impossibly low 10% of MSRP, that’s still $30 trillion dollars based on the math above and well more than he has.

        • GreenM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why are you guys so literate about it. OP just used something called exaggeration.

  • PeroBasta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Incredible. I clicked to read the article, but there was no article! A title and a sentence.

  • elscallr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    John said he pressed representatives of Tesla on whether he or Rob were at fault for the damage, to which he claims he was told that it was a weather issue. He added: "They said that the battery is effectively submerged in water. How can that be our fault?

    The car got flooded, then? That’s an insurance problem not a repair problem.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Due respect and support for Elon hatred, but this story is stupid. No one gets water ingress on a tesla battery from driving through puddles. The family didn’t want to pay for it, the horrible “newd” organization (I refuse to even name them) knows mentioning Elon makes better news, and this whole thing is an insurance issue and somehow Elon is mentioned.

    Quick, without looking, who is the CEO of Toyota, Honda, Chevrolet, or Ford?

    Even if you know, who cares? Exactly.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because it fits the narrative of the slightly radicalised userbase.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Usually because the Daily Mail and The Sun are worse, and because leaning towards the left/Labour let’s The Mirror off a bit in some people’s eyes.

  • masquenox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have zero sympathy for anyone that bought anything connected to Phony Stark. Zilch.

    You knew what you were buying into - you live with it.

    • cricket97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get everyone here loves to hate have hate boner for musk but any electric car will break down if submerged in water. If tesla’s were breaking from simply driving in the rain, you would have heard about it.

      • Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hell son, any car will break down when submerged. ICE cars don’t like inhaling water either.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think a journalist might write a news article about a guy having a $17,000 repair bill after driving one in the rain to let us hear about it?

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t about Elon. While it’s about one of his companies, Elon has little to nothing to do with this story.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. It is not about Elon. It’s about the doomed nature of BEVs. Any technology that can give you a £17,000 repair bill just because it is wet means it is not a viable technology. Though it’s sad that people have been fooled by Elon’s bullshit about his companies. Which is why stories like this come up. Ultimately, BEVs are dead-end and this cannot be changed. It will be a matter of when BEVs are abandoned in the marketplace, not if.

        EDIT: Again, no amount of lying to yourself will change reality. BEVs are a dead-end and always will be.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            A fuel cell stack has a few hundred dollars worth of platinum. The rest is just conventional materials like steel or plastic. Not very expensive. The whole stack is very small too, weighing just 50kg for an average car.

            So with mass production, it will be less than a combustion engine. You’ll get more savings by getting rid of the transmission and catalytic convertor. You pencil out the cost, and going with “first principles,” the whole vehicle will be the same or less than a conventional ICE car.

            • zurohki@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, and an EV battery has a few hundreds of dollars worth of materials in it too, but somehow they’re always going to be tens of thousands of dollars and fuel cells will get cheaper due to mass production?

              • Hypx@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Actually no. It has thousands of dollars of raw materials in it. That’s why BEVs can’t go behind a certain cost floor. But FCEVs can.

  • Renere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    idc about this post but i clicked on the article anyway to see gay people

    that’s so cool…