• silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Utility-scale batteries are getting to the point of displacing a bunch of that gas. Nuclear is sufficiently expensive that we’re probably only going to use modest amounts of it.

    • farcaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think nuclear is expensive in part because we didn’t build enough of it. The more you build of something the more costs come down.

      An opportunity was lost in the 80s when everybody abandoned nuclear as oil prices were coming down and energy demand stagnated. And Three Mile Island just happened which, understandably, made utilities nervous to invest in nuclear.

      • Fermion@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        China and South Korea have much lower plant build cost and timelines. The really high delays and cost increases in the west are more an indication of problems in beauracracy and contract writing than fundamental to nuclear technology.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Maybe. And in the mean time we will keep burning that natural gas while a solution we can build out today sits idle.