• bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah same. I know what they mean but it’s not what’s there and it’s hard to take it seriously 🙈

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Now we are trying to make a less obvious headlines to push pro meta propaganda, right?

    We, the signees of the fedipact are not in fear. We know that meta has a horiffic track record of both human rights violations and data security violations.

    Its actually the core reason why I decided to make a new community at !anticorporate@lemmy.giftedmc.com. Those who think that corporate greed and shareholder primacy are cancer in our society are very welcome.

    • blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Fedipact is deeply regressive. It follows web2 logic, meaning, it treats the arrival of Meta, like it delt with problems in web2: it uses defederation like cancelling - although cancelling heavily depends on the network effects of social media, most of which Meta owns. While in web2, it was possible to isolate people that one was at odds with through this, it doesn’t work like this here, because the cost to do so are much higher, when in web2 they were zero. You are basically trying to cancel the thing that gave you cancelling. This is why the Fedipact will be neither effective against Meta, nor other similar problems in the future. Most of this stems, I think, from the fact that the Fediverse is overwhelmed with the situation and doesn’t have a better solution, and that it hasn’t really understood network effects and how they work in the new, federated social web; so, it falls back in old, regressive behaviour.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        We‘re not cancelling anyone. We‘re shaping our world like we see fit. You should try it, its great.

        • blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That’s great, but you are not alone in this world. You cannot just pretend like Meta doesn’t exist. Actually, it will be the most powerful instance in the Fediverse. Its a new reality the Fediverse finds itself in and you just want to opt out of it and carry on like before. I understand it, but I just don’t think it will work.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Your wording shows that you‘re fully convinced that meta is some kind of deity. Instead, they’re a cancer that spreads through the internet and the real world by now. We‘re not ignoring them, we‘re effectively boycotting them.

            For a short best of of meta‘s misdeeds, visit the fedipact.

            • blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Your wording shows that you‘re fully convinced that meta is some kind of deity.

              Nope, just a company. I know that it has done some bad things. I just don’t think your strategy is effective.

              We‘re not ignoring them, we‘re effectively boycotting them.

              How can you effectively boycott something without social media? The Fediverse has ca. 2 million active users, Meta services have much more. If boycotting something means cutting yourself off from most of social media, nobody will notice and it won’t hurt Meta a bit. Its the #deletefacebook all over again.

              • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You can think that my strategy isnt effective. I just couldnt care less to be frank.

                I‘m not cutting myself off from most of social media more than when I left facebook, twitter and then reddit.

                You got it backwards mate. They are following us because we‘re gaining traction. We‘re just going to stay ahead.

                • blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  They are following us because we‘re gaining traction. We‘re just going to stay ahead.

                  Agreed.

                  It’s fine. I guess we want to achieve the same thing but with different strategies. Let’s see what the future will bring.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Meta’s moral shortcomings are even more reasons to federate with them and try to win over users and pressure Meta to implement better digital rights as well.

    “The terrorists moral shortcomings are even more reasons to negotiate with them and try to win them over.”

    Don’t negotiate with terrorists.

    Also the article sets up defederation from Meta as if it doesn’t do anything. I don’t think that’s true though.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The terrorists moral shortcomings are even more reasons to negotiate with them and try to win them over

      You’re not negotiating with the terrorists (Meta), you’re engaging with the public to explain why the terrorists are bad and why they shouldn’t buy what’s being sold.

      The argument is that we aren’t going to win this with sheer numbers or funding, so we need to slowly get people to understand why they are better off picking Mastodon/Fediverse over threads. Every instagram user is already being tossed into Threads, and you can’t bring those people over if they never see posts or content from the Fediverse

      • Blaze@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        you can’t bring those people over if they never see posts or content from the Fediverse

        It’s still possible. Reddit didn’t became popular because it federated with Digg.

        When Lemmy will become the reference for human provided answers, people will join. How fast it will happen depends on how bad the experience on Reddit becomes.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe. But that’s a big maybe. It could equally be that Threads becomes the most powerful entity on the Fediverse and what they do becomes law (like shutting off a certain instance).

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yea the other part of my reasoning is to try and prevent them from getting to that point.

          The short version of which is that our biggest selling point is “Join Mastodon, you can see all the same content and do the same things, but it’s run by a non-profit instead of Facebook”. Defederation means we lose that point, and it’s going to be very difficult for Mastodon to compete with the money and manpower that facebook has.

          “Join Mastodon to see content that you can’t see otherwise” will have a much harder time competing with “Join Threads to see content that you can’t see otherwise”

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            In principle, yes. But if 99% of users are on one server, then that server has a disproportional amount of power in the network. If they choose to defederate another server, it’s essentially a death sentence.

              • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Most users would probably jump away from that server in that case, so in all likelihood they would.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              That makes absolutely no sense. If they choose to defederate then it is no different than if they had never federated in the first place, which is what it sounds like you want.

              • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                It is different because if we defederate in the first place, then perhaps 99% of users would not congregate in that server.

                • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  What server are you referring to? Threads? They already have 99.9%. No one is going to join Threads because it’s “the biggest server”, they’re going to join because they’ve never heard of the Fediverse and want to chat with their friends and follow businesses and personalities.

                  If they know what the Fediverse is, they’re not going to join Threads, because no fully-informed person is going to make that decision.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    It can’t. But that was never the intention. Soul was never the intention. The intention was reducing reliance on proprietary and cancerous platforms.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean there are a shitload of reasons to not federate with Threads, but I feel like “it will federate ads to your server” is kinda the only one I should need to mention.

  • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    We need some basic rules,

    1. No single direction federation
    2. Users own their content and can licence it as they feel fit

    With these 2 it would be hard to fuck up

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Users “owning” their content in that way would be the instant death of the Fediverse. If anyone can put whatever nonsense license terms they want on each individual comment or post, how could that chaos possibly be federated?

      A better approach would be to recognize that if you’re posting your words up on a giant billboard you’re not going to be able to control who sees them.

      • ItsAFake@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Users “owning” their content in that way would be the instant death of the Fediverse. If anyone can put whatever nonsense license terms they want on each individual comment or post, how could that chaos possibly be federated?

        A better approach would be to recognize that if you’re posting your words up on a giant billboard you’re not going to be able to control who sees them.

        Would quotes fall under fair use or copyright infringement?

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I imagine legal questions would be answered similarly as with email. If I send an email from my abc.com email address to your xyz.com email address, who owns the email? Who has copyright over it? I think the answer should be the same for Fediverse content.

          • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            According to a quick Google search (I’m no expert on copyright law), a sufficiently original email is automatically copyrighted. What constitutes “sufficiently original” seems to be pretty arbitrary.

            So I guess if you post a short story, that’s automatically copyrighted. Commenting “this” is not. And then there’s a huge grey zone in the middle.

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think the same basically applies to… Anything. I mean a sufficiently original book is copyrighted but a sufficiently unoriginal book is not. Substitute book with any kind of media you want.

              Makes you realize how finicky copyright is.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Is there single direction federation right now? I don’t think there is?

      Also it would probably be more realistic for instances to put a default license on content. Users don’t want to bother choosing a license and most users wouldn’t even know what that means.

      • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        100% have instance user defaults etc those who want to custpmise further can do so its already part of peertube and pixelfed.

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    how can the Fediverse grow without loosing its soul in the process?

    It can’t? Rather obvious that the “soul” of a community is defined by it’s members and the bigger the community the more mainstream this soul will become. Maybe the federation mechanic offers some solutions here, but that remains to be seen.

  • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Does the fediverse need to maintain its “soul”? As long as it preserves user choice and corporate resistance, the rest isn’t required and can be maintained in those specific instances.

  • tutus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can we stop all this philosophising and just get on with enjoying it for what it is? Please?

    I’m really tired of hearing everybody’s thoughts on Meta and Threads. And souls. And money. And the future. There are too many captains of the ship who want their 15 minutes of steering time. Opinions ate like assholes, everybody has one.

    If you want Meta and Threads in your life, then join it or an instance that is going to federate with it. If you don’t, move to an instance that won’t. Same applies for any community that your part of. Or start your own. That’s the beauty of this.

    Can we please let it rest?