• bisby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    Having a “don’t pull me over, im on your side 😉” sticker makes perfect sense if you’re an idiot who is doing things worth being pulled over for.

    • skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is real logic there. While not a sovtard and I drive safely, I found that having such a sticker on the back window usually turns a ticket into a verbal warning, if youre a couple mph over the speed limit. Even if you dont like the police it’s beneficial to have a such a sticker. In my case it was a simple small benefit dinner sticker for a officer in need.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I have a very strong memory of a bodycam video where the sovtard keeps screaming “BUT I’M ON YOUR SIDE” as he’s getting pulled through his busted car window.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think it was a standalone video, it was probably either in a compilation or Donut Operator’s sovereign citizen bingo. But if finding it means watching hours of sovtards getting reamed by the dildo of consequences, I won’t say no.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Reminds me of a guy that used to live in a neighborhood near where I was living at the time, that had both American and Confederate flags attached next to eachother on back of their pickup truck.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I saw one of those. The flags were bumper stickers. They were underscored by another sticker that read, “One nation, under God.”

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m sure they only drive on privately owned roads they’ve negotiated with the owner to be allowed on, right?

    Because believe it or not if you own a vehicle and only ever drive that vehicle on private property in most states you can do that without following any government rules.

    Like, you’d have to transport that vehicle to the property with another vehicle that is properly following the state’s rules.

    And of course you’d have to bring your fuel in from outside. And any spare parts…

    (I’m sure some states have restrictions even on private property only operation)

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s actually very coherent, and one of the frankest expressions of conservatism you’ll ever see; “Laws for thee, not for me”.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Seriously. This car screams conservative.

      Performative worship of police is part of the conservative identity so they have to announce it to everyone. And the sovcit motive is usually “I want the benefits of society without paying for them.” Typical conservative selfishness.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      No registration stickers? I think most states use those to show you paid the yearly fee to maintain the roads…