This is quite concerning

  • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    We should outlaw political advertisement on social media? Kind of like how cigarette advertisement was eliminated from movie theater ads.

    The fines should be stacked as factors - unmitigated offenses will build up and incur exponentially growing fines. Very large incentive to shut that shit down.

    Politics should be advertised by performance review, not marketing.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Concerning is that someone thinks that something from meta can be used as a tool for election integrity

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I work in integrity at Meta. It’s mostly about staying legally compliant with the countries we make $ in. You have to keep in mind we have like 4 billion users, and own 5 out of the top 10 most used apps (hello antitrust?), so it’s a pretty big deal here.

      • blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Tell us more stories. I have former relationships with your trust and safety folks among others. Never heard from integrity

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Telegram, WhatsApp, and iMessage are all e2e encrypted but backups aren’t. That’s how your messages get read.

          Messenger is actually the most secure platform out of the 4 because there’s no unencrypted cloud backups. However, there’s discussion on rolling back the encryption on Messenger because it’s too good and causing UX pains.

  • skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I kind of can’t stand Biden, in spite of the many surprisingly good things he’s done in the last few years.

    But god damn if this isn’t the kind of action from Meta that can only help Trump.

    I am sorry to feel that this decision from Meta has much more to do with certain ongoing wars and preferred candidates than any “EU legislation.”

    Meta wants Trump. Meta wants fascism.

    • gaifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      in spite of the many surprisingly good things he’s done in the last few years

      …that’s about when I stopped reading.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        He isn’t great, but he has done some pretty good thing. (Lots of not good things too, obviously.) He’s taken steps with student loan forgiveness, he’s empowered the FTC and DOJ to enforce anti-trust regulations that haven’t been used in far too long, and he’s done a good number of other things too, but nothing else large is coming to mind at the moment.

        They suck at communicating, but they have actually done some good. Biden is far from my choice of president, but it does seem like the progressive faction has at least moved him in the right direction. It’s far from ideal, but he isn’t that bad.

        • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Lol you think progressives moved him

          He is STILL desperately trying to win conservatives. DNC fucking DESPISES us.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Care to use your words and explain? It sounds like you just want to complain and only make things worse. What did I say that wasn’t true?

  • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My hope is that the FBI asked them to shut this down on NSA’s behalf, so threat actors feel more comfortable as they aren’t being watched, studied, and analyzed by every OSINT collective in existence.

    My fear is that they know what happened the previous 2 elections and this year will be the worst yet, and they don’t want their users knowing how badly they got duped and feeling bad/dumb enough to leave the platform. Also advertising $$.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Dark money from other countries is a good boogeyman, but it’s basically irrelevant. Biden and Trump are going to spend between 2 and 3 billion on the election collectively. The hundreds of thousands or millions a foreign government may spend is a rounding error.

      • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It has nothing to do with money spent. One is active hatefully divisive propaganda infesting the minds of the country on a total scale. We have multiple US Senators and Congresspeople saying the eclipse and earthquakes are a sign from God ffs. Have you been on reddit in the last few months? If not, I urge you to take a peek. Even in small hobbyist subreddits now every other post is pure hate or FUD, and every other comment is someone taunting people to fight them with divisive and very obvious left/right comments, much worse than the typical “lol seems like a typical lib/cuckservative.” It comes in waves, which I assume is reddit finding and banning them, making them rotate accounts and continue the karma generating process so they can post and comment in karma limit subs (the idiotic questions.)

          • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Its the devil you know vs. the devil you don’t. One is trying, at least in some part, to quell fears and stabilize the nation and economy. The other is actively creating division and fear at every turn. Or course project mockingbird, any Hollywood movies or shows featuring the military, etc.

            Does Russian meme technology have a secret sauce?

            I guess you could call it secret sauce. A department of the military for offensive informational warfare, with lots of training, tooling, time and resources. I’m sure we do the same thing but there’s a reason our adversaries have heavily censored internet access and they can’t freely go onto YouTube or Google and search for topics of interest, or use reddit or Facebook openly without a VPN. They know what their capabilities can do to cripple a nation from the inside and make everyone hate each other and the government. There’s no way they’d let us do the same to them, but there is going to be a major revolt when the US decides to do it here.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “We will give you tax breaks, you’ll help us build out theocratic fascism!”

      (If anyone asks: Facebook already got caught spying on abortion providers in red states, expect even worse once Project 2025 is enacted.)

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It would benefit a social cause that is near and dear to his heart: making Mark Zuckerberg extremely wealthy

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          nobody reads the headline because the headline is often just wrong, or flat out lying to you.

          Nobody reads the contents of the article because 90% of the time it’s just blabbering on about how social media was in 2009, or how their grand mother used to make cookies, or how printing is so annoying because the ink ALWAYS seems to be running out.

          Rather than actually fucking talking about the topic on hand. Not to mention all the ads and placements that are put over this shit, the ad block blocker pop ups, the paid services like the NYT forcing you into not reading it at all “because you’ve used your reading quota for the month” The sheer amount of fucking time it takes to load what is basically just HTML text on a background, but it isn’t because it uses JS because fuck you i guess.

          The internet is incredibly hostile these days. It’s impossible to do something on it without a door to door salesman pestering you every fucking step of the way.

        • dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          the title doesn’t explain shit. Sure it’s a “tool for election integrity observer” but that’s barely an explanation. Incredibly broad. Can still be a lot of things. Sounds as if Facebook is guarding the entire election

  • kae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This a huge step back for transparency with Meta (shocker). Access to this data is important for a variety of reasons, and using the recent EU laws as an excuse is deplorable (again, shocker from Meta).

    It’s clear the data companies were left alone for too long to rule the schoolyard. It’s going to take some time to treat them and others what decorum looks like without throwing an absolute hissy fit.

    Here’s hoping the EU, which seems to be the only teacher on the playground willing to discipline anyone, will set them straight.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I thought we were starting over. What makes you think there won’t be cops?

            A badly MSPainted, AI Generated police officer in Walmart with Walmart logos on his cap and badge, and holding an AR-15 assault rifle

            It’s cute how people think scrapping the constitution and starting over will somehow make things better.

            • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Why do you think there will still be wal-mart?

              And why do you think the constitution binds anyone who matters? You’re treating it like a fucking magic spell.

              • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                They are among the top five richest corporations in the world and the leading employer in the world, last I checked. You going to dissolve that power? No? They have money and power, they will make the rules. You have to either find a way to dissolve them (good luck with that!), or you have to have another big power structure to keep them in check. That’s how it works.

                • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  This power structure is based on faith and agreement. Its more fragile and fractious than you think.

                  And what the fuck are you smoking if you think the government is opposed to corps? Can I have some?

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Imagine thinking the owning class wouldn’t be the ones creating the new constitution…

              Something needs to change, but once we open that can of worms were going to see things like:

              “All citizens are required to give all personal data to meta whether using the platform or otherwise.”

              “Oil will be enshrined as the National Energy Source™”

              “Union activity is an act of economic terrorism.”

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        How do you prevent it from turning into a “might makes right” system ?