• Cagi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Generation methods that destroy key ecosystems of threatened and endangered species is not what I’d call “clean”. We can do so much better than dams, getting rid of them in place of actual green power would be an incredible, healing boon to these major rivers and the ecosystems they support.

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Large hydropower is not counted as “Renewable” by California. We have renewable portfolio targets, and we import a lot of wind power from the north to meet the standards.

      • Cagi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        California power is awesome. Until recently, it was almost all nuclear. Those reactors take 6 hours to spin up and wind down. As demand went up for the day, they’d supplement their systems by buying power from BC. As the demand went down at night faster than the nuclear could wind down, they would pay BC to take their excess. You need to use you excess load or you blow up your grid. So BC was making money providing AND taking power at different points throughout the day.

        Now, thanks largely to solar, California is generating so much power they have to pay people to take the excess during peak hours. Such an incredibly fast transformation. They still buy a bit at night, but California is quickly freeing itself from dependence on other systems.

        So while they still import a bit of Hydro power, they’ll be fully autonomously renewable really soon.