• Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    People love to repeat this, but US companies aren’t coming from a place of hostile intent like china’s special brand of tik tok for the states.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hmm, here’s what Zuckerberg said when he launched Facebook:

      According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

      Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

      Zuck: Just ask.

      Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

      [Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

      Zuck: People just submitted it.

      Zuck: I don’t know why.

      Zuck: They “trust me”

      Zuck: Dumb fucks.

      Brutal.

      Could Mark have been completely joking? Sure. But the exchange does reveal that Facebook’s aggressive attitude toward privacy may have begun early on.

      They may not be trying to control elections (they certainly have their fingers in that pie too), but they’re still hostile to users.

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it’s owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

        • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because the USA strong armed them into giving their platform handling to Oracle Corp, a top tier US govt contractor.

          But since pro-palestine cries can’t be silenced on TikTok as easily as Zio media, taking control of the platform is no longer enough

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You say “red scare” as if China isn’t a hostile nation state to the US. Go look at western company penetration in China if you want. Are you calling it “western scare” when China blocks yet another western company? I didn’t think so.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

          • jaschen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Case in point. Vine literally can’t survive and so shouldn’t TikTok. Unless of course it’s getting propped up by a government with endless funds and not focused on profits.

            • jorp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              What’s the connection between Uber and China, then? I thought it was somewhat common for tech companies to be unprofitable for very long periods of time backed only by capital, but it may be China. Has anyone looked into this? Does Xi know what I like to order on weekends? Why haven’t we banned this yet

      • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not the same. China wants to fuck up the American youth. That’s why their version of tiktok is so different from ours. But you already knew that I’m sure

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nah, I don’t use tiktok, Chinese or otherwise so I wouldn’t know the difference. But you’re missing the point.

          • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
          • Chinese organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.

          And yet, you claim one is inheritly worse than the other or should be preferered. To me, they are equally bad. If anything, the USA manipulation is worse - they can use that knowledge more easily and to greater effect than an attacker on the other side of the world.

          • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago
            • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
            • Chinese organisationsgenocidal dictatorship abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
          • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Are the American companies doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?

            Is the Chinese company doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?