![](https://lemmy.my-box.dev/pictrs/image/238bb7ef-8e89-44cb-9bc9-1560c98a9b3a.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Because people don’t read articles, and this way OP can still get the rage-engagement
In a way, that’s what I’m contributing to now as well. So that’s why I’m not even going to
Because people don’t read articles, and this way OP can still get the rage-engagement
In a way, that’s what I’m contributing to now as well. So that’s why I’m not even going to
I’d wager the main reason we can’t prove or disprove that, is because we have no strict definition of intelligence or sentience to begin with.
For that matter, computers have many more transistors and are already capable of mimicking human emotions - how ethical is that, and why does it differ from bio-based controllers?
Oh my. Sometimes Betteridge’s law of headlines is wrong.
Ah, yes, I do.
So… What link did you send?
At least this is opt-in, and Firefox still allows for manifest v3 extensions, and, on the whole, isn’t using a engine funded by a billion dollar company that’s doing everything in it’s power to spy on you.
At the risk of committing whataboutism - the same can be said about Facebook, Google, etc. And I don’t say that to marginalise the problem. Quite the contrary - I honestly feel it should be illegal to gather this level of personal detail about people.
That the focus right now is on tiktok is suspect, to say the least, but I guess the upside is that the problem is getting attention now.
Your goldfish lived for 20 years?!
Yeah, because that worked so well with tracking popups.
As The Times told BleepingComputer last week, the attackers used exposed credentials to hack into the newspaper’s GitHub repos.
It explicitly says the credentials were leaked. If you’re really going to insist the word “hack” implies something else, I’m afraid you’re too far on the spectrum for me to continue this conversation. Cya!
Please point out where it states that Microsoft leaked it, rather than the more likely case of NYT leaking their credentials.
[Citation needed]
So… Unless Microsoft directly leaked those credentials, I don’t see how it would be their responsibility.
Moving goal posts.
Op said Don’t use AI, you’re saying Don’t use AI everywhere.
You first.
Check out OP defending Apple in every comment in this thread. It would be funny if it weren’t so… yeah.
Is github, owned by Microsoft, the largest public code repository?
Can you elaborate on that?
Unless all the ai generated code is explicitly marked as ai generated this approach will go wrong eventually.
Undoubtedly. Hell, even when you do mark it as such, this will happen. Because bugs created by humans also get deployed.
Basically what you’re saying is that code review is not a guarantee against shipping bugs.
Sure. But they do that by providing services. Services like Gmail and (probably for a large part) cloud hosting for other companies, companies whose services you’re probably using as well.
And honestly, it usually is more economical (Both financially as well as in eco footprint) for those companies to use cloud services that scale based on demand, rather than having a fixed set of servers running for the potential max capacity.
Don’t get me wrong, increased carbon emissions is bad, but the picture is a bit more nuanced than “Google flip switch, kill animals, get money”.
The AI hype (talk to your toaster!) will blow over, useful AI will remain and improve, this is just a hurdle along the way.