• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just a note that a lot of these would be very negatively impactful on many lower income level people who depend on what transportation they can manage. If there was a fast move to replace the needs with public infrastructure like rail and bus, then maybe the financial hit would be less for them. “Get a job within walking or bike” doesn’t always work out.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      This problem is less significant if the transit is free. Even if the transit isn’t free if transit is roughly the same speed as taking a car it would be far cheaper than car ownership.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        And it could (and is in many places) be subsidised for low income people too, if free transit isn’t politically viable. And the money raised from some of the other measures like congestion pricing and carbon pricing could partially be returned to low income people as well, with the rest going to further roll out public transit and active transport options.