I know current learning models work a little like neurons but why not just make a sim that works exactly like how we understand neurons work

  • los_chill@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Neurons undergo physical change in their interconnectivity. New connections (synapses) are created, strengthened, and lost over time. We don’t have circuits that can do that.

    • Neuromancer49@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Actually, neuron-based machine learning models can handle this. The connections between the fake neurons can be modeled as a “strength”, or the probability that activating neuron A leads to activation of neuron B. Advanced learning models just change the strength of these connections. If the probability is zero, that’s a “lost” connection.

      Those models don’t have physical connections between neurons, but mathematical/programmed connections. Those are easy to change.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s a vastly simplified model. Real neurons can’t be approximated with a couple of weights - each neuron is at least as complex as a multi-layer RNN.

        • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d love to know more.

          I recently read “The brain is a computer is a brain: neuroscience’s internal debate and the social significance of the Computational Metaphor” and found it compelling. It bristled a lot of feathers on Lemmy, but think their critique is valid.

          Do you have any review resources? I have a bit of knowledge around biology and biochemistry, but haven’t studied neuroscience.

          And no pressure. It’s a lot to ask dor some random person on the internet. Cheers!