👉 word salad
You would think that people who believe that certain words and phrases unlock special cheat codes that get you out of all debts and responsibilities would be more careful with their language.
They just tossing everything at the wall to see what sticks.
I still can’t figure out if they think they are making sense, or if they are just as lost as the rest of us, and they are just hoping for the best, because someone told them these words have power.
Here’s a really good paper on SovCits. I think it’s intended to educate judges and other officials. It’s a little focused on NC, but most of it applies broadly.
This is really good, thanks. Helps me explain it better.
Here’s a much longer and more detailed documentnin sov cits. From a judge in Canada.
It’s a seminal work on sov cits. Who they are, where they come from, what they are talking about, and how courts and lawyers can handle them. It goes through all their arguments.
Meads vs Meads is a classic. It’s so good.
Also here are a whole whack of pseudolaw cases I very much enjoy: https://www.canlii.org/en/#search/sort=decisionDateDesc&text=Pseudolaw &searchId=2024-05-05T20%3A22%3A43%3A601%2F30daaa35e45b4fdbbbb4535c5c076fe0
Very handy search tool up there in Canada. Some real gems in there.
The whole site is an interesting rabbit hole to fall down. I’ve learned a lot about how child protection decisions are made, for example.
Power, that is what these words have that your words don’t. Me’s words are the best which is why me uses them. ME WANT HONEYCOMB!
I’s apologies, me is hungry.
Edit: I’ve reread this, and I’m truly sorry.
are jus’ as powerful
You gained zero time by putting an apostrophe where a letter goes! This is an absurd waste of time!
Com’on, just 'cause it ain’t faster, doesn’t mean it’s a waste of time. They can give a text a relaxed and casual tone.
I read the UCC quite a bit during my business law classes. Years later and I testified as an expert in a criminal case and while waiting for a procedural hearing, some nutter starts going off to the judge about how his signature on some court paperwork doesn’t count and starts citing sections from the UCC. Being criminal court, the judge and attorneys didn’t recognize the references and lectured the guy about wasting time. Later I told one of the attorneys he was quoting the UCC, which has absolutely no bearing on criminal proceedings. We had a laugh, good times.
Google gets these folks into so much trouble.
This one sovcit group I’m in is called Secured Party Creditors. They are the ones who are obsessed with the UCC. I’m still not quite sure what kind of meth they use.
It’s funny because under the UCC a signature is defined more or less as “any mark made with intent to authenticate.” You can literally wipe your ass with a contract and it’s as good as your signature if you do it with the intent to authenticate the document. An X, thumb print, squiggly line, all good signstures. Even if someone else makes the mark for you, if you intended them to do it to authenticate on your behalf, it’s as good as your own signature.
This may not be true and something like a will or a service contract, because those fall outside the UCC, which only applies to the sale of goods and securities.
If you’re totally off the grid, you don’t have electricity or internet, so I think that would be right.
You can have electricity off grid using solar panels. But not Internet.
Where I live, there’s totally open and free WiFi hotspots dotted around the area.
They’re set up by idealists and political activists.
If you’re in reach of one of them, you can be off the grid and still get internet.
But you’d better know a thing or two about network security before you connect.Hm, that’s on the borderline of what is or isn’t “off grid”. The Internet itself is a “grid”, so if you’re connecting to it in any way at all then i think that’s “on grid”. IMO
Ah yes, I’ve read 4 and 4A. And who could forget 7? Such great articles!
I was gonna read 7 but I haven’t read 6 yet. Can I skip ahead or should I go in order?
