The European Commission chief said she was “convinced that if the competition is fair” from China, then Europe “will have thriving durable economies”. But she said the “imbalances” caused by state support for Chinese industry leading to cut-cost products threatened jobs in Europe, and that was “a matter of great concern”. “Europe will not waver from making tough decisions needed to protect its economy and security,” she said.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    When companies want to drive down wages by outsourcing to China: “you need to learn to compete with China”

    When companies are faced with cheaper products made by Chinese competitors: “we all need to put a stop to this”

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    God forbid we, the European consumers get to buy cheaper products. What’s China doing so right that they can sell stuff for cheaper? What are we doing wrong?

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Europe: “We’re outsourcing our industrial capacity to the far east, because we can hire their workers for a pittance. Now we can fire all our domestic workers and still profit off our domestic consumers.”

    China: “Damn, look at all this amazing new business capital. We should use it to improve our own lives and livelihoods. Oops! Now wage rates are rising, as we transition to a consumer economy.”

    Europe: “Oh shit. Oh fuck. Chinese labor went up a fraction of a percentage point, cutting into our profit margins. Launch the trade war. Launch the trade war!!!”

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Only that’s part of the story. China’s trade war with the US and their own domestic economic downturn has them looking for other markets to dump their excess goods (electric cars, etc.).

      The EU is their only lifeline right now. If they get into a trade war the China will have nowhere to dump their goods except for Africa and South America. Those markets are not nearly as lucrative or built out.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        China’s trade war with the US and their own domestic economic downturn

        I’m sorry, their downturn? China’s economy grew 5.2% in 2023.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The EU has restated its readiness to launch a trade war with China over imports of cheap electric cars, steel and cheap solar and wind technology.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Electric cars Solar panels Wind tech

        Everything else doesn’t directly compete with their oil monopoly. They should keep their tariffs for when we aren’t on the cusp of an ecological collapse, bunch of corrupt cunts.

        • Dieguito 🦝@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And if imported goods have cheap prices due to ignoring labor rights, worker safety and environmental protection it is acceptable… This is hypocrite and really does not deserve further comments.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s fine but like you said, nothing else is being targeted. Out of all the products, they specifically target the ones leading to a greener, less oil dependant society.

            You were asking why it’s being targeted and it’s specifically not because they are ignoring labor rights, worker safety or environmental protections.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They (the EU) want to achieve a goal… stop the Chinese government from financially helping a company allowing them to undercut competitors and bankrupt competitors who do not get government aid.

        If you want to influence behavior you have to show where you want the other party to go. So you don’t hit other sectors that do not have this aid… because that would be unfair.

        Game theory 101… tit for tat. They help a sector, we fine that sector.

        • Dieguito 🦝@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not a “fine” but a XIX century protectionistic measure which is unlikely to help anyone (except making people poorer because higher prices mean higher expenditure for consumers). And from here to the next inflation spiral there is just a small step…

          • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            If a government helps a company from their country artificially lower their prices, that causes an unfair advantage to their competitors. And the competitors go bankrupt, the surviving government sponsored entity is then a monopolist able to increase the prices as they want. And the jobs are gone. So how does that fit I to your view on things?

            And you are right, it is not a fine, it is a tarrif. But for the explanation the word fine worked better to explain it I thought.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          All companies working in the energy and transport sector receive vast subsidies and financial help from whatever country they are located in.

          This isn’t about unfair practices, since it’s literally a common practice. This is to protect oil companies and the car makers who took bribes instead of pivoting and are now feeling that decision.

          • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No it is not. The EU asked for information from the companies to show how they come to their prices and they chose not to comply.

            Drawing comparison to another sector is not helpful as what is common for one sector is not for the other and leads to unfair advantage.