• TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    This makes me think of people that add a “copyright” notice at the end of every comment

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ugh the ones with the “anti-AI” “licensing”? I honestly don’t know how they expect that to accomplish anything, other than look like a pretentious idiot.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s either fair use to train, and the license does nothing, or it is not fair use to train, and the license is extraneous. I explained that to one of them and he said the license isn’t actually supposed to do the “anti-AI” he claims it does. Thus winning the discussion, I guess.

      • the_third@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Any better idea how to prevent scraping or, at least, be able to fight it after the fact?

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          For the US: you already have a copyright on everything you write. Adding CC-BY-NC grants others the right to republish it for non-commercial use, it does not remove any rights at all.

          • the_third@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes, that is how that works, correct. CC-BY-NC specifically prevents commercial use and as far as I see that, that’s the point of those people that add that footer to their posts.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              No, that’s not how it works. Commercial use is already prohibited by default. They are adding no new prohibitions. They are allowing use that is not allowed by default.

          • the_third@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s like saying “If you don’t want corporations to steal your sourcecode, just don’t publish it.” That’s just not the right conclusion to come to.

            I think it should be absolutely possible to communicate with other people in the open while still maintaining some kind of control over your creation.

            • brianorca@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I agree it’s not great for public discourse, but you are subject to the whims of the third party’s TOS. You can still publish it, but have to make your own site or pick a third party that won’t sell you out.

              Or you just accept that the third party is going to do what it’s going to do. Post your discourse, but don’t expect it to be protected.

              • the_third@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                That’s not how copyright works. In my example: Publishing code on GitHub still means that code remains under whatever license I put on it, no matter how GitHub feels about that. They can not go ahead and sell my little helper library to Sony for use in their PlayStation OS update to make a buck. If I put it under GPL e.g., Sony would still have to stick to that.

                Same goes for posting on a public Lemmy instance. I publish content, I can limit it’s usage. The only thing the instance could do about that is remove my content if their usage of it is in conflict with whatever limitations I put on it.

                Should, in some form of future, courts rule that those LLM generating companies can’t just use everything they get their hands on as they please, the poison pill is in their models. That’s why that thing matters now. Could it be done more elegantly than a persistent footer? Certainly. Right now though? I don’t see it.

                • brianorca@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I agree, that’s how it should work. GitHub as a third party probably had better TOS than most, and would face more uproar if they changed it. But they are not a social media site.

                  But for regular social media posting, Facebook, Twitter, etc, there is no fighting against their TOS other than abstinence. You can object in writing with one of those footers, but nobody in charge is going to read it or honor it. It will be shoveled into the AI along with everything else. Your only recourse will be an expensive legal fight, and it would be difficult to prove any particular post was in the AI or not. It’s unproven legal ground to say giving a post to an AI for training even qualifies as a “copy” under copyright, or what notification qualifies to exempt your content.

  • Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ah yes, let’s reference all of the laws, for which you don’t ascribe, to justify you not ascribing to those laws.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    My favorite is the “without prejudice” part. That’s the part of the spell that let’s you banish a demon but don’t prevent it from showing back up later.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m really curious about the “without prejudice” part. I’ve never heard that part of their “lore” before.

    Does it basically end up meaning “give me the rights of this paper/document, but I reserve the right to not meet my end of the bargain”? Because knowing them, this is exactly what it boils down to.

    How much blind faith does it take for these morons to have their whole hope seated in claiming that judges dismissing them bring called a “victory”? To my knowledge none of them has ever succeeded in any way in a court setting, so they have no real examples to point to besides a judge just not seeming it worth the struggle of dealing with them.

    Although at this point we should be seeking to take every one of these cases there are and summarily deciding to rule for their worst case scenario. Movement will likely die off when they spend the rest of their lives such in jail or under an impossible set of fees that they’ll never even make progress on, much less finish off.

    Clearly I jest, but if we could stop ducking these cases and start prosecuting them more harshly, this would naturally go away.

  • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    What’s really interesting to me is how much time they invest in this stuff. It’s not exactly interesting. And there’s no tangible result for them, other than ending up in court. They do end up having to pay tax or whatever it is they’re trying to dodge.

    What do they get out of it?

    These sovcits obsessed with sticking to the DMV just seem like flat earthers - there’s no actual point to the obsession.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Imagine how much fun they would be having with a wizard character in D&D instead of trying to cast spells through the court system.

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I really want to know how they think a regular license plate means the vehicle is for hire.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sovcits make me irrationally angry.

    I don’t understand them, they want to live here and gain all the advantages of living here whilst doing literally everything they can to not contribute to society.

    These motherfuckers should be branded and any money they try to use should be immediately confiscated. I have no problem with someone being outside of civilization, but they should be completely on their own with only other sovcits to take care of them.

    That’d solve this shit real quick.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you say the magic words, laws don’t apply.

    EDIT: I looked up two of these. Theft prevention act? It’s like they’re randomly cutting and pasting parts of laws and in their heads somehow it makes sense.

    I can also randomly pick words from legal documents to say anything I want. But then, every word in this post came from a legal document including the following:

    I now own your house and by having read this post you consent to a transfer of all your assets to me. No signature or confirmation required. No take backs.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Granted. You are now on the hook for her child support payments for my raising her kids.

        The one thing a sovcit can never do.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You didn’t capitalize anything so I’m RUBBER and you’re GLUE. It is now your RESPONSIBILITY as I have claimed my RIGHTS.