On May 26, a user on HP’s support forums reported that a forced, automatic BIOS update had bricked their HP ProBook 455 G7 into an unusable state. Subsequently, other users have joined the thread to sound off about experiencing the same issue.

This common knowledge regarding BIOS software would, then, seem to make automatic, forced BIOS updates a real issue, even if it weren’t breaking anything. Allowing the user to manually install and prepare their systems for a BIOS update is key to preventing issues like this.

At the time of writing, HP has made no official comment on the matter — and since this battery update was forced on laptops originally released in 2020, this issue has also bricked hardware outside of the warranty window, when previously users could simply send in the laptop for a free repair.

Overall, this isn’t a very good look for HP, particularly its BIOS update practices. The fragility of BIOS software should have tipped off the powers at be at HP about the lack of foresight in this release model, and now we’re seeing it in full force with forced, bugged BIOS updates that kill laptops.

  • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I thought UEFI had replaced BIOS a number of years ago. Or are we just keeping the name BIOS because everyone knows it?

  • Xanx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    My wife’s Elitebook was also bricked by the most recent forced BIOS update.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    after Windows pushes new firmware

    If a Linux distro pushed bad HP firmware, people would be blaming the Linux distro. Why does Microsoft get a free pass?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      They don’t get the blame, but they definitely will earn a conspiracy charge. They didn’t commit the crime but they drove the van.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Some Linux distros probably did push the bad HP firmware. Vendors push updates via fwupd.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I think it’s HP that pushed the update though. So I’m guessing that it’s their driver that they broke not windows in general.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      It’s not really Microsoft’s fault, they’re just delivering what HP releases via the firmware update channel.

      I mean, Microsoft are a bag of dicks, but not on this one.

  • recursive_recursion [they/them]@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    On the offhand chance that someone with a bricked HP laptop stumbles here looking for what to do,

    • I’d recommend on removing the M.2 SSD (gumslice-shaped PCB that contains your data) to protect your data
      • this can be found by googling your laptop’s serial number and looking for the manual, after downloading the PDF file you’ll be able to open it with Firefox
      • you’ll typically need a philipshead screwdriver to access and remove the laptop’s case and remove the SSD

    I’m assuming the users might be coming from Windows

    • Dalraz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Assuming BitLocker wasnt enabled and if so you backed up your key. Otherwise your data is gone.

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I’d strongly recommend against that at this point since it will be useless without your Bitlocker key form the laptop’s TPM.

      • recursive_recursion [they/them]@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        yeeesh is this with Windows 10 and/or 11?

        still not a fan of Windows

        edit:
        just remembered this is Windows 11, unfortunately I know some people that got forced to use it with most modern laptops

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Even if it isn’t “bitlocker” branded, most Windows PCs ship with “BitLocker” enabled. The distinction between Windows Home disk encryption and “BitLocker” is that BitLocker additionally allows external management of the key material, while Home only supports the TPM and your microsoft account for the key/recovery codes.

          • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            most Windows PCs ship with “BitLocker” enabled

            No, they simply do not. Microsoft branded hardware, sure. But I’ve never seen a Dell or an HP with Bitlocker enabled from the factory, and at this point I’ve put my hands on thousands of them.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              I can tell you every factory preload of windows on a Lenovo I have seen for the past few years has disk encryption on by default (windows home, so not “bitlocker”, but it’s the same thing with respect to being tied to TPM.

        • breakingcups@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          When did you last check the statistic you just pulled from your ass? Bitlocker is on by default on all machines that support it, which is all pc’s and laptops being sold the past few years.

          The only exception used to be when you bypass oobe to create a local user account, which also isn’t supported anymore.

    • tibi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Microsoft should also be to blame here. Sending BIOS updates via automatic windows updates should not be a thing.

        • Voyajer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Not sure when the sentiment changed, but it used to be heavily recommended against updating the bios on any computer unless there was a specific feature or fix your computer needed.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Sentiment changed when the “BIOS” became a component for enforcing security architecture via “SecureBoot” and also Bitlocker sealed to PCRs only does so much if the BIOS code is vulnerable. Now they really badly want a “trusted” chain from some root of trust until the OS bootloader takes over. Problem is that the developers have historically enjoyed being in a trusted, single user context for decades and so the firmware has been full of holes when actually pushed.

  • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I swear when it comes to forced updates of any kind it seems like this kind of outcome is always inevitable. There will at some point always be a bad update.

  • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    At a business we had an hp laptop for 6 months before it bricked. We sent in for warranty, they sent it back saying we broke it in a noncovered way

    It was a workstation on a table top that never had any food etc near us. Even with appeals they will not fix it. My IT guy is now aware we do not do business with them.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    The idea of forced automatic BIOS update is dumb. BIOS only should initialize its required components and fuck off afterwards.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Presumably any model using the same motherboard/chip set, running that OS, I would think. Not my area of expertise.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    After the first 4 words of the title I was assuming it was intentional - Glad it doesn’t seem to be, but HP’s reputation is just that bad.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      What are your suggestions? The only reasonable choice I’ve found is the Framework. I’d prefer if I had more than a single choice.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        I don’t buy enough laptops to answer that. My last purchase was an Asus which I’m happy with, but after their recent scandal with scamming customers on warranties I don’t think I’ll be buying from them again. But HP has such a terrible track record with laptops, printers, and just the way they operate in general for consumer stuff, that I would never consider purchasing consumer devices from them.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I work at in a place that has 1000s of these piece of shit probooks. There is so much marketing about environmentalism yet these laptops are e-waste after 4 years if they even last that long. No one repairs any thing.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I tried to disable the atom cores on the £2000 laptop recently.
      It took me about 10 mins not finding it in the BIOS, to discover that HP just doesn’t have an option for it.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I have a no HP policy because of their printers and a no Samsung policy because of their TVs.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    At the time of writing, HP has made no official comment on the matter — and since this battery update was forced on laptops originally released in 2020, this issue has also bricked hardware outside of the warranty window, when previously users could simply send in the laptop for a free repair.

    I am not all that big on conspiracies, but this is HP, which is famous for screwing people over for as much money as possible and bricking perfectly usable technology, so if it turns out this was intentional, I won’t even be a little shocked.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I’d go Hanlon’s Razor on this, because I’ve seen some stunning stupidity. It’s not all evil when some of it is just plain dumb, because of incomplete testing and oversight, because they cut costs to save money, so the CEO gets a bonus, and ohhhhhhhh I see it now.

      It’s evil.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Are we sure it is the BIOS? Perhaps these people have run out of magenta subpixels or their printer ink subscription has lapsed.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Heh. Same HP. Though? I forget which company got what in the divorce. I think this one is the “code built by revolving-door sweatshops and who has budget to validate it” and not the “standing over the corpse of Print and hoping lock-in will keep customers” one. The two sides may sound the same but I’m sure there are differences.

      (Keeping score at home? A drunk sailor with a fist full of hundies still can’t buy anything off that horrendous website, so some things haven’t changed in the divorce)

  • x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    If you don’t use HP and you don’t use windows you won’t have the problem. You should be boycotting HP as a part of BDS anyway. https://bdsmovement.net/boycott-hp

    “But I already bought an HP.” If you had adopted BDS much earlier like you should have you wouldn’t have these problems.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I wish HP made good products so I could not buy it to boycott them. But I already don’t buy their crap.

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    The article doesn’t say/clarify. Was it some crap HP software that performs driver updates, and it decided to force a bios flash? Or was it windows update itself?

    If it was windows itself, holy crap, that’s a serious over reach on Microsoft’s part. Like “this is insanity windows needs to be removed” bad.

    • efstajas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      It was most likely HP, through Windows Update (which handles device-specific driver etc. updates that OEMs are in control of). Microsoft doesn’t concern itself with pushing BIOS updates to some random 4-year old HP model