• redisdead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Felon = already shown they aren’t normal human beings fit for society. I’m not going to trust my property to a known criminal, when I can easily get someone who’s normal.

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s a free-rider problem. As an individual, you don’t want to rent to a convicted criminal. But as a society, we want criminals that served their time to be able to rent, because if they can’t they’ll be forced to squat, which will increase the probability they’ll continue to do more crimes (they already broke the law by squatting), so we do want people to rent to them.

      • redisdead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        If society wants to host convicted felons then society can pay for it.

        I’ll be more than willing to host them if I am guaranteed the refund of any and all damage they create, and the ability to remove them from my property whenever I want.

        In the meantime, as long as I’m on the hook for damages caused by a bad tenant and I don’t have the legal right to evict a bad tenant on a moment’s notice, then I will filter out convicted felons, and other risky tenants.

        It’s easy to say ‘you should do this thing’ when you have no skin in the game.