• mecfs@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    They can also be used on non-guided tracks — ie. vehicles cleared to work on roads too with a driver. More versatile.

      • Oddbin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Is oftentimes better than a master of one.

        People always miss that bit out.

        • dillekant@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Was watching a YT video against this idea. Basically the occupancy is quite low per dollar, and generally there’s not much expertise in building them. This means the city/state is tied to one company which can ream them price-wise. If you need the occupancy, get a train.

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If the buses use electric traction and charge continuously whilst on the guideway, that could be a win, in allowing for smaller batteries and less downtime than a regular electric bus (especially if the unguided portion of the route is a “last mile”, comprising a relatively small proportion of the route). If they’re just regular diesel buses, it seems somewhat pointless.