I have noticed that a lot of LGBTQ+ advocates are strongly opposed to any insinuation that being queer is a choice, largely due to right-wing rhetoric from the 80’s and 90’s that homosexuality was a “lifestyle choice”, an argument that aimed to establish queerness as a willful act that could be restricted and punished. I 100% disagree with this characterization of queerness, as one absolutely has no power to simply choose not to be queer. We cannot choose our attractions, we must be allowed to explore our desires and make the most of them. We have a fundamental right to pursue happiness.
But that right is rooted in our ability to make choices. What else is freedom than the right to choose? Marriage rights include the right to marry the person of our choosing. Sexual freedom includes the right to have consensual sex with people of our choosing.
Without choice, we don’t have freedom.
And yet today, even though we are mostly past the generic “harmful lifestyle” arguments of decades past, people will still reflexively reject any narrative that enshrines choice as a fundamental right as it relates to gender and sexuality.
This prevents us from making some of the most universal and compelling pro-LGBT arguments we could make.
Instead of letting the narrative that banning gay marriage only affects gay people, we can properly argue that banning gay marriage means that the government is taking away ~50% of your choices for marriage. It doesn’t matter if you’re gay or straight, the point should be that the government wants as say in who you choose to marry.
Instead of letting the narrative be that banning being trans only affects trans people, we can properly argue that banning being trans means that the government is taking away your choice in how to dress or present yourself. It doesn’t matter if you’re trans or cis, the point should be that the government wants a say in how you dress, or what kind of makeup, if any, you’re allowed to wear - or they want control over your healthcare choices.
Bisexual and genderfluid people exist entirely on flexible choice, and despite the rhetoric that everyone is born with a lifelong sexuality, plenty of people have experienced changes in their sexuality over the course of their lives that strongly invalidates this notion that sexuality is static and inflexible. Sexuality exists on a spectrum and can be very fluid.
Choice is fundamental to freedom, so it is a shame that when fighting for freedom for LGBTQ+ people, we often reject the importance of choice.
EDIT: Thanks for the downvotes, message received. I wasn’t aware that my opinion was so popular. I’ll post something less popular next time.
There is certainly a problem with how anti-queer legislation is presumed to only effect queer people, leaving cishets completely safe from the consequences. I guarantee, though, that if (for example) a trans bathroom ban goes into effect you’re going to have cis women getting harassed constantly when trying to use the bathroom.
Not sure if that has anything to do with “choice” though.
deleted by creator
Coming out the closet isn’t a choice but it is a decision, we have to decide to live. The choice is to come out or commit suicide.
That’s not really a choice.
But, I think the argument “being queer is not a choice” was already won. Everyone essentially agrees with that part, even the right.
The disagreement is whether it’s nature or nurture - are we born this way or made this way? That’s why these days the right believes we’re groomed in becoming queer and woke by the Antichrist cult of pedophiles from the Department of Education, the American Federation of Teachers, and Disney. So yes, arguing about whether it is or is not a choice is actually missing the point because we’re at the point where they want to purge society to save their children from the woke mind virus.
But, it’s still not a choice.
deleted by creator