Ismail Haniyeh, a prominent Hamas leader, was assassinated in Tehran, casting a shadow over the fragile ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas. As the diplomatic face of Hamas, Haniyeh played a crucial role in talks brokered by Qatar, the US, and Egypt. His death raises questions about the future of these efforts, especially as accusations fly between Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu and the Palestinian group over stalled truce proposals

The death of Haniyeh, a significant figure in Hamas’s political and diplomatic structure, has raised serious questions about the future of ongoing ceasefire negotiations. American officials had recently indicated that these talks, mediated by Qatar, the United States, and Egypt, were close to yielding a temporary ceasefire and a potential hostage release deal.

However, the assassination has cast doubt on the feasibility of these efforts moving forward.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240731124021/https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/is-ismail-haniyeh-assassination-a-setback-for-israel-hamas-peace-talks-13799147.html

  • cygnus@lemmy.caEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    Gee, ya think? The world is better off without Hamas, but to have Israel assassinate the leadership of a party it was negotiating with is obviously not conducive to good relations. They should have turned him over to the ICC instead.

    • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      I will just send you to my other comment: My own comment.

      I’m genuinely curious if you even know the history of Israel and when Hamas was created.

      The world is better off without Israel and why? Well because they’re the ones committing crimes since 1948 up until now (and ongoing). There’s enough news articles, books and historical evidence of this.

      • cygnus@lemmy.caEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        I’m going to guess you replied to the wrong person, because this has nothing to do with my post.