• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because that’s… not the estimate that the most accurate process they can come up with leads to?

    This sorta reminds me of conversations I’ve had with Trump supporters, where the very idea that you could evaluate a source and one could be more believable than another for reasons other than ideology, (like that one is trying to get the truth and one isn’t), is alien to them.

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah… and the health ministry has been unable to update their stuff due to being bombed out… do you even listen to yourself?

        • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They literally released an updated death count today. 39,653 as of today.

          What are you talking about “unable to update stuff due to being bombed out”? Literally. You make things up.

    • roboto@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean this person has absolutely no idea what they’re talking about if they think journalists publish in The Lancet just because it’s called a journal so I think any discussion is absolutely pointless.