• Scio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As an EXR elitist I deeply resent Google’s blatant sabotage of JXL.

      (And also laugh at the PNG elitists, as is custom.)

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pretty much sums it up. JPEGXL could’ve been the standard by now if Google would stop kneecapping it in favor of its own tech, now we’re stuck in an awkward position where neither of them are getting as much traction because nobody can decide on which to focus on.

    Also, while Safari does support AVIF, there are some features it doesn’t support like moving images, so we have to wait on that too… AVIF isn’t bad, but it doesn’t matter if it takes another 5+ years to get global support for a new image format…

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    TL:DW, JPEG is getting old in the tooth, which prompted the creation of JPEG XL, which is a fairly future-proof new compression standard that can compress images to the same file size or smaller than regular JPEG while having massively higher quality.

    However, JPEG XL support was removed from Google Chrome based browsers in favor of AVIF, a standalone image compression derived from the AV1 video compression codec that is decidedly not future-proof, having some hard-coded limitations, as well as missing some very nice to have features that JPEG XL offers such as progressive image loading and lower hardware requirements. The result of this is that JPEG XL adoption will be severely hamstrung by Google’s decision, which is ultimately pretty lame.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t know, because it sucks and has zero benefits over PNG?

      • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Especially after animated pngs were developed but nobody wanted to support those so we’re stuck with gifs that are actually mp4s or webms.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Strictly-speaking, last time I took a serious look at this, which was quite some years back, it was possible to make very small GIFs that were smaller than very small PNGs.

        That used to be more significant back when “web bugs” – one-pixel, transparent images – were a popular mechanism to try to track users. I don’t know if that’s still a popular tactic these days.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It is, they are called canvas now. I recommend Canvas Blocker addon (doesn’t block them but falsifies them).

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Probably the least relevant benefit of APNG over GIF: Unlike GIF, I can even pronounce APNG with a soft G and not feel gross about it. (Like I’m betraying the peanut butter brand and my entire moral framework at the same time, y’know?)