Mozilla has a close relationship with Google, as most of Firefox’s revenue comes from the agreement keeping Google as the browser’s default search engine. However, the search giant is now officially a monopoly, and a future court decision could have an unprecedented impact on Mozilla’s ability to keep things “business as usual.”

United States District Judge Amit Mehta found Google guilty of building a monopolistic position in web search. The Mountain View corporation spent billions of dollars becoming the leading search provider for computing platforms and web browsers on PC and mobile devices.

Most of the $21 billion spent went to Apple in exchange for setting Google as the default search engine on iPhone, iPad, and Mac systems. The judge will now need to decide on a penalty for the company’s actions, including the potential of forcing Google to stop payments to its search “partners completely,” which could have dire consequences for smaller companies like Mozilla.

Its most recent financials show Mozilla gets $510 million out of its $593 million in total revenue from its Google partnership. This precarious financial position is a side effect of its deal with Alphabet, which made Google the search engine default for newer Firefox installations.

The open-source web browser has experienced a steady market share decline over the past few years. Meanwhile, Mozilla management was paid millions to develop a new “vision” of a theoretical future with AI chatbots. Mozilla Corporation, the wholly owned subsidiary of Mozilla Foundation managing Firefox development, could find itself in a severe struggle for revenue if Google’s money suddenly dried up.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Specifically separate the browser side from the advertiser side. Get rid of that conflict of interest.

  • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This isn’t a new threat. This was always a threat.

    The things that give google money are the reasons why we don’t want to use google. The things that firefox does to get money are basically just giving google the thing that makes them money.

    • foofy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Firefox can do without Google being the default fine. What they can’t do without is all the money that Google pays them to make Google be the default.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem isn’t the search engine - it’s the money.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem is: who is going to hive money for a web browser?

      They got a one of a kind deal with Google, which ended up being problematic, but where else are they going to find the same thing?

      Asking for donations will get you chump change.

  • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If were going to go after them for a monopoly, shouldn’t it be for chromium? At least with search there are actual viable alternatives that don’t get 86% of their money from a direct competitor…

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Mozilla management was paid millions to develop a new “vision” of a theoretical future with AI chatbots

    Is this llamafile?

    The thing about LLMs is that no one knows how to write the ultra low level optimizations/runtimes, so they port others (llamafile largely borrows from llama.cpp AFAIK, albeit with some major contributions from their own devs).

    Performance is insanely critical because they’re so darn hard to run, and new models/features come out weekly which no sane dev can keep up with without massive critical mass (like HF Transformers, mainly, with llama.cpp barely keeping up with some major jank).

    So… I’m not sure what Mozilla is thinking here. They don’t have many of those kind of devs, they don’t have a GPU farm, they’re not even contributing to promising webassembly projects like mlc-llm. They’re just one of a bazillion companies that was ordered to get into AI with no real purpose or advantage. And while Gemma 2B may be the “first” model that’s kinda OK on average PCs, we’re still a long way away from easy mass local deployment.

    Anyway, what I’m getting at is that I’m a local LLM tinkerer, and I’ve never touched or even looked at anything from Mozilla. The community would have if anything of theirs was super useful.

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    While I do want competition in the web space, its a good thing that Google could get told to stop doing stuff like this.

    I dont want Mozilla to die of course but companies need to be held responsible for all the shit they pull. I’d imagine if Mozilla wasnt able to maintain firefox anymore it would fall to the open source community like they said in the article and I’d probably still use it.

    No one company should own the internet.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wonder if this ruling over search engines could spook them with browser development as well considering they nearly have a monopoly with chromium too. Perhaps they’ll release control of it and stop pushing anti-consumer updates like removing your ability to block ads.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Who in the open-source community would pay what it costs to develop Firefox? I hope some organization would, but it’s a huge and expensive project to run.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not at their revenues come from Google and other sources are enough to cover Firefox development… But that would mean giving up on all the useless shit no one asked for they’re working on…

        • Emily (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Mozilla’s next largest source of revenue is subscriptions and advertising (source 2021 financial report), by a wide margin. That “useless shit” is their other revenue, and they’re investing in it because they know they need to diversify revenue to fund Firefox. You’re suggesting they kill it because it’s not their core (unprofitable) business?

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        In before Meta buys Mozilla, lol.

        Zuckerberg is on a “spoiling other tech giants with Facebook money” streak.

      • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Great question that I dont have an answer for. Maybe one of the foundations that supports Linux development? This is just my hope though. No idea what it would really take to maintain Firefox at this point. Maybe if it was scaled down or something it’d be ok in the hands of just the open source community as a whole but I’m not well versed in programming or development so i dont know.

        I gotta try and be optimistic about this kinda stuff because i forsee a future where Google just ruins more and more of the internet and i hate the thought of that.

        • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Servo is now being looked after by the Linux Foundation in Europe, but is only maintained by volunteers. But another project has arrived that is not based on Chromium, Webkit or Firefox, which may be a hope in this somewhat confusing situation.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m thinking of governments using it and helping. They could have their computers running without Google sticking its nose.

    • kakito69@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’d need a hundred million people sign up for that $5 subscription to make up for Google’s bribe.

      • deleteme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Your math is off. It would take 8.5 million people donating $5 a month, to equal the 510 million a year from Google.

        My math (please correct me if I am wrong):

        $510 million / 1 year

        $ X / 1 month?

        $510 million / 12 months = $42.5 million / 1 month

        $42.5 million / $5 per person a month = 8.5 million people a month

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Also, Mozilla says that it spends only $220M on software development expenses, so if 100% of the money went to that it would only require 3.7 million people paying $5 per month.

          But, IMO, if the Google money spigot is turned off, it might be that other companies that rely on web browsers (Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft, etc.) will want to spend at least a few tens of millions on Firefox. That would mean that end-users wouldn’t need to support the entire cost of developing it.

          Right now, everyone except Apple uses Blink which is a Google project tied to Chrome. Since Google has been found to have been illegally abusing their monopoly, the status of Chromium / Blink has to be uncertain. It would be smart insurance for these companies to ensure that Firefox doesn’t go away in case something happens to Blink.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Is it not

          5 x 12 = 60

          $510 000 000 / $60 = 850 000

          $60 is one year of subscription for if user.

          850 000 users need to pay 60 dollar per year to amount to $510 000 000.

          (Or 510 000 000/5 = 10 200 000 users per month to reach the same amount monthly.)

    • vanderbilt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I am livid over her absolutely disgraceful management over Moz. When electron was building a de facto monopoly of Chromium on the desktop she made no moves to produces equivalent tooling. While Node grew into a behemoth she totally ignored it. The only thing that has come out of Moz in the last decade that mattered was Rust, and she’s already fired the Rust team. She is poison and serves only to suck up a salary that could fund development.

      Mozilla needs its wake up call and to start being the underdog that makes something worth doing. With Manifest V3 and the anti-trust case on the horizon they have a fork in the road that will define what becomes of them. Hopefully she can make one good decision and it’ll be the right one.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        thats ceos for ya.

        i doubt they will escape from going through some bad times.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hope some governments and EU see the need of a foss browser engine alternative from a non-profit and stuff some Money there

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If Mozilla collapses for being too deeply intertwined with Google, I won’t mourn them.

    Firefox is open source. We probably need to pass the torch to another maintainer anyway. Mozilla has been betraying their original mission a lot.

    • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ll mourn them but now knowing this gross imbalance of funding it’s frustrating that CEO still has a job - and they will surely get a golden parachute while every other employee will just lose their job.

  • aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Everybody forgets that if chrome and chromium breaks away from Google because of this ruling, it’s going to have the same issues as Firefox, if not worse because it’s an arguably worse product. The ruling has been pronounced, but what will happen because of it is yet to be defined.

    • Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not it at all. The issue is funding Mozilla. Having it as the default search engine is something google currently pays them for the right for. If the DOJ says that’s anti-trust practices, then Google stops paying Mozilla for that right, and 80% of Mozilla’s funding dries up overnight.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I feel like the real problem is Google paying Apple, since they’re both major players, not Google paying Mozilla. Firefox is not a major player at all (unluckily…)

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why would Chrome/chromium break away? Isn’t this just about the search engine side of things? There’s no need to dump Chrome if all they need to do is drop themselves as the default search engine.

  • sparkle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tax/fine Google more and give the profits to competitors like Mozilla (as long as those competitors use the funds for Firefox)