• GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wish. The US is endlessly far behind on public transportation.

    Talking to my own family members around the US, they only have eyes for their enormous gas guzzler pickup trucks that they use to run to the grocery store down the street.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We don’t need public transportation, we have something better, personal transportation… We also have a robust network for air travel that will take you anywhere in the country in a few hours.

      • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personal transportation is extremely inefficient. You need to pay a bunch of money for something, in order to get around, and it is always space inefficient, bad for the environment and encouraged parking lot creation over housing.

        • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It literally takes me exactly where I am going using the shortest possible route, no detours, stops or transfers, in the shortest possible time (excluding jetpacks or helicopters), that is peak efficiency of a mode of transportation.

          • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re missing price. Compare your trip to Public transit costs, and include infrastructure costs. You had to pay for your vehicle, your car insurance (which in the US there are irresponsibly low legal minimums), registration, gas, and also taxes for the infrastructure, to get yourself somewhere which takes up more room than needed (usually several times more room than a combination lf walking and public transit). Public transit only requires fare pricing, along with infrastructure, which is significantly cheaper per person due to more efficient use of space.

            Compare many European metro cities to the US, and you’ll notice their public transit is more convenient (in the characteristics you have pointed out) because we decided to shut ourselves in the foot as a country and forced everyone to have to get a car payment, while making public transit bad.

            Of course, public transit isn’t convenient for every area, such as rural towns in which personal vehicles are a better solution, but we have many cities where there should be significantly better public transit.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            shortest possible route

            No. That would be a straight line like a train.

            no detours, stops

            Lmao. Whatever. Don’t stop, genius.

            the shortest possible time

            That would be high speed rail.

          • trashacct@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            This only works if you live in areas with no traffic. I have had multiple commutes in different cities, and would take a train whenever possible because of how unpleasant the drive is during rush hour (not to mention driving took longer, in one case 2.5x as long!). I don’t even live in a city, I’m just forced to commute because that’s where the work is. I love cars and have been an enthusiast all my life, but there are many reasons why public transportation is so popular around the world. The US might be somewhat unique in the challenges it faces with public transit, but it is still a better, cleaner, cheaper, and more efficient solution for most of the miles Americans are driving in cities or other congested areas.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can have both. Europe has a great mix. So awesome to have the option to take the train or bus. They also have awesome road infrastructure in most places. Try comparing an American freeway to a German freeway. You feel like you’re in a third world country when you come back to the roads in the States.

        • Gsus4@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          On the one hand, I hear the arguments that Europe has a higher population density, more hubs and smaller cities that make trains effective, but the same efficiencies and cost cuts can’t be achieved in the US.

          On the other hand, I played railroad tycoon and saw how trains and trams were extremely successful to quickly connect and develop a sparse US through efficient public intercity and in-city transport and feel disappointed with the lack of imagination 🥲

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            more hubs

            USA has zero hubs because the transportation system is not developed even by the standards of the 1800s.

            smaller cities

            Yes, smaller cities can survive with decent transit. Sadly that’s not going to happen in USA. It’s a sad concrete wasteland.

          • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Europe as a whole is not a lot smaller than the US, so I think many of the same efficiencies can be achieved. China has also been able to do it very efficiently, which is basically the same size as the US. Granted, they have a much larger population and more potential customers, but it can definitely be done.

            • Gsus4@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              As I said, lack of imagination. There is this bump in effort that has to be transposed to reach actual returns on investment because energy is too cheap and secure atm. But once that bump is transposed, there is a large landscape of gains, but they can’t see past the bump.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          And even better! All this got rid of those pesky winters

          And replaced it with an extended hurricane season.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        People driving around in personal tanks is not “something better”.

        It’s dumb, privileged, unsustainable, unhealthy, violent, and literally destroying the planet.

  • Beaver [she/her]@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The new red line between San Francisco and San Jose is the newly built electric rail line.

    The coloured lines are electrified railway. It really does stick out, its good progress.

  • coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Now that the US doesn’t rely on auto manufacturing as it’s main industry, people are coming around on trains.

    But, what’s that rule about headlines ending in a question mark? 🤔

  • TheBest@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    "India is on the cusp of electrifying 100 percent of its rail lines, while China is nearing three-quarters of its network. Over 57 percent of the rail system in the European Union is electric. The US, which has historically prioritized personal cars over high-volume passenger trains, now can boast that it has two electric trains — and more on the way. "

      • LordPassionFruit@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe we should reanimate John MacDonald. Not to be a politician or give him any legitimate power (for obvious reasons), just give him a bat and make him a CN lobbyist.

        Surely we’d get our rail soon.

  • RangerJosie@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    No. We’re not even on board with trains as a concept outside of the context of heavy freight shipping. The people are. But big oil spends a lot of bribe money to make sure you can’t easily ride a train across the country.

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    electric trains are an over one hundred year old technology.

    lol. lmao, even.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t understand this article. It talks as if these trains in California are the US’ first electric trains.

    Our light rail here in Portland OR is electric.