• emmy67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s not in anyone’s interest. It’s the surest way to have a thousand national search engines which are all shitty. National walled internet Gardens etc

    Break it up instead

    • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      How would there be thousands? There aren’t thousands of nations, and everyone would still use Google.

      If you break it up, that’s how you get thousands of shitty versions.

      Maybe some countries might disable Google if it was owned by the US, but I have a feeling those countries already have their own issues with Google as it stands now.

      I just think if the monopolistic corporations are too big and too essential to take down, then nationalization is a solution with many more positive traits than negative.

      • emmy67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That hasn’t been the case if you look into what happened with Microsoft and browsers.

        The other thing is

        everyone would still use Google.

        Is actually wrong, and what they proved with the antitrust case itself. A huge chunk of the anticompetitive activity was Google paying to be the default because people don’t change the default.